We view the current state of reference discipline theory dominance in the MIS field as constituting a hegemony. This panel discussion will examine why this has potential harm. In counterpoint, we will present the argument that reference discipline theory use should continue. Aside from the fact that reference discipline theory is used, there are benefits derived from it which should be acknowledged and, perhaps such use should be encouraged and broadened. Additionally, we will present perspectives regarding alternatives to reference discipline theory aimed at building and expanding indigenous IS theory
Recently, IS research has been criticized for lacking in rigor and relevance. One reason for this is...
For over 20 years, researchers expressed their concern for the lack of theoretical development in th...
This essay discusses whether “stealing” theories from other disciplines should always be avoided or ...
We view the current belief in reference discipline theories and their value in MIS research as exhib...
We view the current state of reference discipline theory dominance in the MIS field as constituting ...
Information Systems scholars continuously debate about the nature of the IS discipline. Recently a s...
Two articles published in this issue (Wade et al. and ours) through similar analyses reach contrasti...
© 2018 selection and editorial matter, Robert D. Galliers and Mari-Klara Stein; individual chapters,...
Information Systems scholars continuously debate about the nature of the IS discipline. Recently a s...
Two articles published in this issue (Wade et al. and ours) through similar analyses reach contrasti...
The conventional wisdom amongst information systems (IS) researchers is that information systems is ...
We in the Information Systems community often describe our discipline as being of an inherently appl...
This paper discusses what is needed to make MIS into a coherent research field. It defines 3 main ne...
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a radical alternative perspective into the debate on diver...
For the past two decades notions of cumulative tradition and reference disciplines have been a s...
Recently, IS research has been criticized for lacking in rigor and relevance. One reason for this is...
For over 20 years, researchers expressed their concern for the lack of theoretical development in th...
This essay discusses whether “stealing” theories from other disciplines should always be avoided or ...
We view the current belief in reference discipline theories and their value in MIS research as exhib...
We view the current state of reference discipline theory dominance in the MIS field as constituting ...
Information Systems scholars continuously debate about the nature of the IS discipline. Recently a s...
Two articles published in this issue (Wade et al. and ours) through similar analyses reach contrasti...
© 2018 selection and editorial matter, Robert D. Galliers and Mari-Klara Stein; individual chapters,...
Information Systems scholars continuously debate about the nature of the IS discipline. Recently a s...
Two articles published in this issue (Wade et al. and ours) through similar analyses reach contrasti...
The conventional wisdom amongst information systems (IS) researchers is that information systems is ...
We in the Information Systems community often describe our discipline as being of an inherently appl...
This paper discusses what is needed to make MIS into a coherent research field. It defines 3 main ne...
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a radical alternative perspective into the debate on diver...
For the past two decades notions of cumulative tradition and reference disciplines have been a s...
Recently, IS research has been criticized for lacking in rigor and relevance. One reason for this is...
For over 20 years, researchers expressed their concern for the lack of theoretical development in th...
This essay discusses whether “stealing” theories from other disciplines should always be avoided or ...