This paper argues that there is no ethical support for a request from an editor to cite previous works in a journal to which the author is submitting work. It posits that higher values should exist in academia and that the reviewer’s task is difficult enough. The paper looks at the specific question raised on AISWorld and tries to put this in the context of a supportive ethical framework, without success. It then moves to consider the roles and responsibilities of reviewers and editors more generally. The paper concludes by calling for openness and honesty in the review process with only changes for the good of the article being proposed
The practice of a publisher requiring authors to include citations to previous articles in the publi...
Peer review is one of the most efficient ways to ensure the quality of papers for possible publicati...
Editorial peer reviewers play an important role in shaping the direction of knowledge growth of thei...
This paper examines the common, and highly complex, practice of academic citation use. Inasmuch as...
Editors have made requests of manuscript authors to carefully examine their reference lists and to i...
A recent and controversial issue in the academic publishing process is “forced journal self-citation...
Increasing evidence suggests that unethical citation practices (e.g., inaccurate quotations, excessi...
Much has been said about the ethics of requiring a submission to include a set number of citations/r...
Traditionally, ethics of a profession or organization are laid down by their pioneers, or subtly eme...
The practice of editorial self-referencing - journal editors requiring that authors include in the...
Journal self-citation and its effect on impact factors is a much more controversial and hotly debate...
This paper responds to the question of whether it is ethical for a journal editor to request an auth...
Responsible Authorship and Peer Review presents the basic issues facing researchers at the publicati...
Publication of articles in so called “reputed” journals and achieving high citation counts for the p...
Journal editors have observed a greater occurrence of reviewers agreeing to peer review but never co...
The practice of a publisher requiring authors to include citations to previous articles in the publi...
Peer review is one of the most efficient ways to ensure the quality of papers for possible publicati...
Editorial peer reviewers play an important role in shaping the direction of knowledge growth of thei...
This paper examines the common, and highly complex, practice of academic citation use. Inasmuch as...
Editors have made requests of manuscript authors to carefully examine their reference lists and to i...
A recent and controversial issue in the academic publishing process is “forced journal self-citation...
Increasing evidence suggests that unethical citation practices (e.g., inaccurate quotations, excessi...
Much has been said about the ethics of requiring a submission to include a set number of citations/r...
Traditionally, ethics of a profession or organization are laid down by their pioneers, or subtly eme...
The practice of editorial self-referencing - journal editors requiring that authors include in the...
Journal self-citation and its effect on impact factors is a much more controversial and hotly debate...
This paper responds to the question of whether it is ethical for a journal editor to request an auth...
Responsible Authorship and Peer Review presents the basic issues facing researchers at the publicati...
Publication of articles in so called “reputed” journals and achieving high citation counts for the p...
Journal editors have observed a greater occurrence of reviewers agreeing to peer review but never co...
The practice of a publisher requiring authors to include citations to previous articles in the publi...
Peer review is one of the most efficient ways to ensure the quality of papers for possible publicati...
Editorial peer reviewers play an important role in shaping the direction of knowledge growth of thei...