Add to ORKGThis editorial introduces the debate between Alter and Benbasat and Zmud about whether IT artifacts or systems in organization are the appropriate model for a core for IS. It also describes the articles on the dedbate by 10 authors and gives some opinions of the editor on the subject
Three related papers recently argued for the adoption of specific \u27organizing principles\u27 for ...
In this debate section, Neil McBride (affiliated with the Centre for Computing and Social Responsibi...
The IT artifact and debates about the core of the IS field received a lot of attention in the last...
Debates about the core and the scope of the IS field and about whether the core and scope are relate...
Debates about the core and the scope of the IS field and about whether the core and scope are relate...
Even though computerized information systems are a relatively recent phenomenon that continues to ev...
This paper raises questions for the IS community that contribute to the ongoing debate of defining t...
Information Systems and other academic fileds struggle with what is termed an identity crisis. For I...
Papers published about the need for a theoretical core in the information systems (IS) discipline ca...
The “IT artifact” and debates about the core of the IS field received a lot of attention in the last...
This article is intended to address three of the issues raised by Hassan (2014) in his essay: “Value...
Henry C. Lucas is Editor-in-Chief of AIS publications. This opinion article is the first in a series...
In one of the recent additions to the IS identity and diversity discussion, Alter questions the def...
Recent discussion about MIS centers on its role as an academic discipline and the utility of the cor...
In an important ISR research commentary, Orlikowski and Iacono [2001] argue that the IS field does n...
Three related papers recently argued for the adoption of specific \u27organizing principles\u27 for ...
In this debate section, Neil McBride (affiliated with the Centre for Computing and Social Responsibi...
The IT artifact and debates about the core of the IS field received a lot of attention in the last...
Debates about the core and the scope of the IS field and about whether the core and scope are relate...
Debates about the core and the scope of the IS field and about whether the core and scope are relate...
Even though computerized information systems are a relatively recent phenomenon that continues to ev...
This paper raises questions for the IS community that contribute to the ongoing debate of defining t...
Information Systems and other academic fileds struggle with what is termed an identity crisis. For I...
Papers published about the need for a theoretical core in the information systems (IS) discipline ca...
The “IT artifact” and debates about the core of the IS field received a lot of attention in the last...
This article is intended to address three of the issues raised by Hassan (2014) in his essay: “Value...
Henry C. Lucas is Editor-in-Chief of AIS publications. This opinion article is the first in a series...
In one of the recent additions to the IS identity and diversity discussion, Alter questions the def...
Recent discussion about MIS centers on its role as an academic discipline and the utility of the cor...
In an important ISR research commentary, Orlikowski and Iacono [2001] argue that the IS field does n...
Three related papers recently argued for the adoption of specific \u27organizing principles\u27 for ...
In this debate section, Neil McBride (affiliated with the Centre for Computing and Social Responsibi...
The IT artifact and debates about the core of the IS field received a lot of attention in the last...