An abstract argumentation framework [15] consists of a direct graph where nodes represent arguments and arrows represent an attack relation among arguments. A semantics is used to evaluate arguments’ acceptability. In the labelling approach [7], this evaluation is done by assigning to each argument a label in, out or undec, meaning that the argument is considered consistently acceptable, non-acceptable or undecided (i.e. no decision can be taken on arguments’ acceptability)
The paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argumentation graphs (i.e., ...
An argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The nodes and the edges of the...
International audienceThe paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argume...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...
An argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a semantics for evaluating th...
Ranking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments in an abstract argumen...
In almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a lethal effect on its target...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A w...
Given an argumentation framework – with a finite set of arguments and the attack relation identifyin...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
International audienceThe paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, w...
International audienceAn argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The node...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...
The paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argumentation graphs (i.e., ...
An argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The nodes and the edges of the...
International audienceThe paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argume...
International audienceArgumentation is based on the exchange and the evaluation of interacting argum...
An argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a semantics for evaluating th...
Ranking-based semantics are a way of assessing the acceptability of arguments in an abstract argumen...
In almost all existing semantics in argumentation, a strong attack has a lethal effect on its target...
Dung’s theory of abstract argumentation is a formalism that represents conflicting information using...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing a set of arguments. A w...
Given an argumentation framework – with a finite set of arguments and the attack relation identifyin...
29th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 17th Pacific Rim International Co...
International audienceThe paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, w...
International audienceAn argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The node...
International audienceArgumentation is a process of evaluating and comparing sets of arguments. Rank...
The paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argumentation graphs (i.e., ...
An argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The nodes and the edges of the...
International audienceThe paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argume...