Argumentation theory (AT) has been gaining momentum in the health care arena thanks to its intuitive and modular way of aggregating clinical evidence and taking rational decisions. The basic principles of argumentation theory are described and demonstrated in the breast cancer recurrence problem. It is shown how to represent available clinical evidence in arguments, how to define defeat relations among them and how to create a formal argumentation framework. Argumentation semantics are then applied over the built framework to compute arguments justification status. It is demonstrated how this process can enhance the clinician decision-making process. A encouraging predictive capacity is compared against the accuracy rate of well established...
Argument-based decision making has been employed to support a variety of reasoning tasks over medica...
Abstract. This paper summarises our position on the use of symbolic methods for reasoning under unce...
The paper describes results from an observational study on argumentation in the medical setting, whi...
This study investigates role of defeasible reasoning and argumentation theory for decision-support i...
This paper demonstrates how argumentation schemes can be used in decision support systems that help ...
This thesis describes some of the problems in providing care for patients with breast cancer. These ...
<p>Objective: While EIRA has proved to be successful in the detection of anomalous patient res...
AbstractClinical discussions usually taking place in healthcare structures allow medical specialists...
The first aim of this article is to provide readers informally with the basic notions of defeasible ...
Clinical discussions usually taking place in healthcare structures allow medical specialists to focu...
Better use of biomedical knowledge is an increasingly pressing concern for tackling challenging dise...
AbstractBetter use of biomedical knowledge is an increasingly pressing concern for tackling challeng...
We introduce a novel Ontology-based Argumentation Framework (OAF) that links a logic-based argumenta...
Better use of biomedical knowledge is an increasingly pressing concern for tackling challenging dise...
Developing a care plan for a patient requires an understanding of interactions and dependencies betw...
Argument-based decision making has been employed to support a variety of reasoning tasks over medica...
Abstract. This paper summarises our position on the use of symbolic methods for reasoning under unce...
The paper describes results from an observational study on argumentation in the medical setting, whi...
This study investigates role of defeasible reasoning and argumentation theory for decision-support i...
This paper demonstrates how argumentation schemes can be used in decision support systems that help ...
This thesis describes some of the problems in providing care for patients with breast cancer. These ...
<p>Objective: While EIRA has proved to be successful in the detection of anomalous patient res...
AbstractClinical discussions usually taking place in healthcare structures allow medical specialists...
The first aim of this article is to provide readers informally with the basic notions of defeasible ...
Clinical discussions usually taking place in healthcare structures allow medical specialists to focu...
Better use of biomedical knowledge is an increasingly pressing concern for tackling challenging dise...
AbstractBetter use of biomedical knowledge is an increasingly pressing concern for tackling challeng...
We introduce a novel Ontology-based Argumentation Framework (OAF) that links a logic-based argumenta...
Better use of biomedical knowledge is an increasingly pressing concern for tackling challenging dise...
Developing a care plan for a patient requires an understanding of interactions and dependencies betw...
Argument-based decision making has been employed to support a variety of reasoning tasks over medica...
Abstract. This paper summarises our position on the use of symbolic methods for reasoning under unce...
The paper describes results from an observational study on argumentation in the medical setting, whi...