We consider a job contest in which candidates go through interviews (cheap talk) and are subject to reference checks. We show how competitive pressure - increasing the ratio of "good" to "bad" type candi- dates - can lead to a vast increase in lying and in some cases make bad hires more likely. As the number of candidates increases, it becomes harder to in- duce truth-telling. The interview stage becomes redundant if the candidates, a priori, know each others' type or the result of their own reference check. Finally, we show that the employer can bene t from committing not to reject all the applicants
peer-reviewedCan employers use realistic job previews to encourage applicants to open up in job int...
This study investigates how two situational elements influence people's propensity to lie about thei...
Personnel selection involves exchanges of information between job market actors (applicants and orga...
Abstract: We consider a job contest in which candidates go through interviews (cheap talk) and are s...
Job applicant faking, that is, consciously misrepresenting information during the selection process,...
In the past years, several authors have proposed theoretical models of faking at selection. Although...
Abstract. We study two-sided matching markets where the matching is preceded by a costly interviewin...
In this paper, we show how the interaction between costly screening and competition in decentralized...
Interviewing in professional labor markets is a costly process for rms. Moreover, poor screening can...
In many situations, people can lie strategically for their own benefit. Since individuals differ wit...
This paper studies employer recruitment and selection of job applicants when productivity is match-s...
Overconfidence is an important bias related to the ability to recognize the limits of one's knowledg...
There has been surprisingly little research on faking in the employment interview, despite the fact ...
Job interviews have been the object of extensive academic research and of advice literature. Yet bot...
Companies build their structure with employees that are good at performing their jobs and completing...
peer-reviewedCan employers use realistic job previews to encourage applicants to open up in job int...
This study investigates how two situational elements influence people's propensity to lie about thei...
Personnel selection involves exchanges of information between job market actors (applicants and orga...
Abstract: We consider a job contest in which candidates go through interviews (cheap talk) and are s...
Job applicant faking, that is, consciously misrepresenting information during the selection process,...
In the past years, several authors have proposed theoretical models of faking at selection. Although...
Abstract. We study two-sided matching markets where the matching is preceded by a costly interviewin...
In this paper, we show how the interaction between costly screening and competition in decentralized...
Interviewing in professional labor markets is a costly process for rms. Moreover, poor screening can...
In many situations, people can lie strategically for their own benefit. Since individuals differ wit...
This paper studies employer recruitment and selection of job applicants when productivity is match-s...
Overconfidence is an important bias related to the ability to recognize the limits of one's knowledg...
There has been surprisingly little research on faking in the employment interview, despite the fact ...
Job interviews have been the object of extensive academic research and of advice literature. Yet bot...
Companies build their structure with employees that are good at performing their jobs and completing...
peer-reviewedCan employers use realistic job previews to encourage applicants to open up in job int...
This study investigates how two situational elements influence people's propensity to lie about thei...
Personnel selection involves exchanges of information between job market actors (applicants and orga...