Praxis Gaje Petrovića

The author’s approach is based on three premises: 1. that Gajo Petrović’s Praxis was an outstanding phenomenon in Croatian, Yugoslav and European culture, a challenge of freedom in a repressive society; 2. that there has never been such a thing as “Praxis group”, “philosophers of practice” or “Praxis philosophers” with a unified philosophical and socio-theoretical orientation; and 3. that political and ideo - logical attacks on Praxis were part of the repressive system that targeted every in - stance of cultural and scientific dissent. The political leadership of Tito’s regime, its ideological and propaganda appa - ratus systematically disseminated allegations, denunciations and accusations against Praxis and Gajo Petrović. The same style has survived through radical historical changes from the appearance of Praxis until today. The attackers have often been the same persons, with the difference that in earlier times they denounced Praxis and Gajo Petrović as enemies of “socialism” and the “socialist self-management system”, and in the changed political fashion as “servants” of Tito’s authoritarian rule. The fate of Praxis in the former regime has been trium phantly interpreted as a “family quarrel”. This paper attempts a sociological analysis of the political destiny of Praxis. The analysis is essentially determined not by old and new political and ideological questionings of Praxis, but by Gajo Petrović’s fundamental belief that there is no freedom without the human or humanity without freedo