We discuss the implications of various models of settlement negotiations for the revelation or suppression of private information held by the parties. This information may be relevant to multiple audiences, including those involved in the instant lawsuit; other potential litigants that may subsequently make use of the information in their own suits against one of the parties; and more distant observers and users of the legal process. We also examine how rules of evidence and rules of civil procedure can sometimes result in different degrees of purposeful or (arguably) unintended information suppression
Settlement is more likely if parties are free to set its terms, including a promise that these terms...
We consider a model of a single defendant and N plaintiffs where the total cost of litigation is fix...
Legal rules for allocating the private costs of civil litigation, or ''fee-shifting'' rules, provide...
We discuss the implications of various models of settlement negotiations for the revelation or suppr...
Lawmakers, courts, and legal scholars often express concern with regard to civil settlements because...
The law and economics literature on suit and settlement has tended to focus on two alternative conce...
This paper develops a game-theoretic model that explores the use of costly signals in a litigation e...
Even the most hotly contested lawsuits typically end in a confidential settlement forbidding the par...
This paper analyzes a stylized model of pretrial settlement negotiations in a personal-injury case. ...
This paper considers settlement negotiations between a single defendant and N plaintiffs when there ...
Recently, the legal and academic communities have been studying the phenomenon of the vanishing tri...
This paper considers settlement negotiations between a single defendant and $N$ plaintiffs when ther...
We briefly review two basic models of settlement bargaining based on concepts from information econo...
Parties engaged in a litigation generally enter the discovery process with different informations re...
Courts, practitioners, and scholars have recently expressed concern over the ex post costs of discov...
Settlement is more likely if parties are free to set its terms, including a promise that these terms...
We consider a model of a single defendant and N plaintiffs where the total cost of litigation is fix...
Legal rules for allocating the private costs of civil litigation, or ''fee-shifting'' rules, provide...
We discuss the implications of various models of settlement negotiations for the revelation or suppr...
Lawmakers, courts, and legal scholars often express concern with regard to civil settlements because...
The law and economics literature on suit and settlement has tended to focus on two alternative conce...
This paper develops a game-theoretic model that explores the use of costly signals in a litigation e...
Even the most hotly contested lawsuits typically end in a confidential settlement forbidding the par...
This paper analyzes a stylized model of pretrial settlement negotiations in a personal-injury case. ...
This paper considers settlement negotiations between a single defendant and N plaintiffs when there ...
Recently, the legal and academic communities have been studying the phenomenon of the vanishing tri...
This paper considers settlement negotiations between a single defendant and $N$ plaintiffs when ther...
We briefly review two basic models of settlement bargaining based on concepts from information econo...
Parties engaged in a litigation generally enter the discovery process with different informations re...
Courts, practitioners, and scholars have recently expressed concern over the ex post costs of discov...
Settlement is more likely if parties are free to set its terms, including a promise that these terms...
We consider a model of a single defendant and N plaintiffs where the total cost of litigation is fix...
Legal rules for allocating the private costs of civil litigation, or ''fee-shifting'' rules, provide...