Citations. These days’ citations can be retrieved from databases such as ACM, Scopus, World of Science and Google Scholar. Each having their set of advantages. From research done on these databases, it was found that there are various under citation in them and they are therefore, often unreliable information sources for the most commonly used citation-based metrics in Computer Science. In addition, Scopus & WOS Databases reflect a significant bias against covered conference proceedings, resulting in underestimation of their impact. In the course of this project, a GS database containing authors and their citation information is built using a custom-built web crawler. With the use of the database, data mining analysis can be carried out to ...
tion Index and later its successor, Web of Science. For almost half a century, these were the only a...
This study uses citation analysis from two citation tracking databases, Google Scholar (GS) and ISI ...
A sample of 1,483 publications, representative of the scholarly production of LIS faculty, was searc...
Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science are some of the most commonly used online databases for sc...
(This is a thesis by compilation of studies. Article co-authors are listed at the beginning of each ...
The Institute for Scientific Information's (ISI) citation databases have been used for decades as a ...
Citation analysis has historically been a metric for evaluation of a scientist or researcher’s acade...
Google Scholar is an increasingly popular search engine with the largest bibliographic database for ...
Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/) provides a new method of locating potentially relevant a...
Abstract. An increasing number of online information services calculate and report the citedness sco...
Google Scholar (GS) has progressively emerged as a tool which “provides a simple way to broadly sear...
Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely cons...
Abstract—Scholarly impact may be metricized using an au-thor’s total number of citations as a stand-...
In recent years, numerous articles have compared the coverage, features, and citation analysis capab...
It is understandable that sponsors of research activities are interested in assessing the work of sc...
tion Index and later its successor, Web of Science. For almost half a century, these were the only a...
This study uses citation analysis from two citation tracking databases, Google Scholar (GS) and ISI ...
A sample of 1,483 publications, representative of the scholarly production of LIS faculty, was searc...
Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science are some of the most commonly used online databases for sc...
(This is a thesis by compilation of studies. Article co-authors are listed at the beginning of each ...
The Institute for Scientific Information's (ISI) citation databases have been used for decades as a ...
Citation analysis has historically been a metric for evaluation of a scientist or researcher’s acade...
Google Scholar is an increasingly popular search engine with the largest bibliographic database for ...
Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/) provides a new method of locating potentially relevant a...
Abstract. An increasing number of online information services calculate and report the citedness sco...
Google Scholar (GS) has progressively emerged as a tool which “provides a simple way to broadly sear...
Despite citation counts from Google Scholar (GS), Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus being widely cons...
Abstract—Scholarly impact may be metricized using an au-thor’s total number of citations as a stand-...
In recent years, numerous articles have compared the coverage, features, and citation analysis capab...
It is understandable that sponsors of research activities are interested in assessing the work of sc...
tion Index and later its successor, Web of Science. For almost half a century, these were the only a...
This study uses citation analysis from two citation tracking databases, Google Scholar (GS) and ISI ...
A sample of 1,483 publications, representative of the scholarly production of LIS faculty, was searc...