GENDER AND WORK FAMILY CONFLICT: TESTING THE RATIONAL MODEL AND THE GENDER ROLE EXPECTATIONS MODEL IN THE SPANISH CULTURAL CONTEXT

G utek, Searle, and Klepa (1991) proposed two models to explain the gender differences in work–family conflict: the rational model and the gender role expectations model. Both models have mostly been tested on American and Canadian samples, and have obtained partial support. Given the cultural differences between North American countries and Spain, we should question whether the two models are equally applicable to Spanish society or whether one of them captures Spanish men and women’s experience of work–family conflict better than the other. So, the aim of this study is to test which of the models better explains the gender differences in work–family conflict in the Spanish cultural context (or if, indeed, the two models apply equally well). Given the typical cultural dimensions of Spanish society, we expected to find greater support for the gender role expectations model than for the rational model. However, the results obtained in this study indicated that, while the rational model can explain the gender differences that were found, the gender role expectations model cannot capture Spanish people’s work–family conflict experiences. The results are interpreted in terms of cultural dimensions characteristic of the Spanish context