Povijesna analiza tretmana mladih s poremećajima u ponašanju u Socijalističkoj Republici Hrvatskoj 1963.-1990.

U ovom radu autorica analizira znanstvene spoznaje o problematici poremećaja u ponašanju mladih u vremenu Socijalističke Republike Hrvatske, s naglaskom na maloljetničku delinkvenciju koja je u to vrijeme bila najaktualnija tema među stručnjacima različitih profila. Prvi dio rada pruža uvid u teorijske spoznaje o mladima s poremećajima u ponašanju, kao i tretmane koji su im pružani u svrhu smanjenja i/ili otklanjanja poremećaja u ponašanju i njihove rehabilitacije. Središnji dio je analiza tretmana na temelju zakona i prakse rada s mladima. Treći dio je sinteza tadašnjih i aktualnih spoznaja o problematici. Polazna pretpostavka rada, da su praksa i tretmani imali utjecaj na smanjenje i prevenciju poremećaja u ponašanju, dakle, kako je do pozitivnih promjena došlo, ovim radom je potvrđena. Institucionalni tretman se sve više smanjuje u korist izvaninstitucionalnog, tj. odgojnih mjera kojima se mladi ne izdvajaju iz svoje okoline, a težište se prebacuje s tretmana djece i mladih s poremećajima u ponašanju, na rano otkrivanje i prevenciju poremećaja u ponašanjuIn this paper author analyzes scientific facts of youth treatment with behavioral disorders in the Socialist Republic of Croatia, highlighting juvenile delinquency which was the most actual topic among experts of different fields. First part of paper talks about theoretical knowledge about youth with behavioral disorders, same as the ways they were treated. Purpose of different treatements was reducing and/or removing behavioral disorders and their rehabilitation. Central part is analysis of treatements based od laws and praxis in working with young people. Third part is synthesis of facts then and now about whole topic. Starting assumption was that praxis and different treatements have had influence on reducing and preventing behavioral disorders. That assumption was confirmed in this paper. Institutional treatement is less used and non-institutional is more popular, especially now. With non-institutional measures, young people are not any more removed from their primary enviroment and focus is more on early discovering and preventing behavioral disorders