We analyze a model of cheap talk in which an expert who faces a conflict of interest with a decision maker is concerned about establishing a reputation for having accurate information. In this environment, an increase in reputation above a certain threshold always makes truthful revelation more difficult to achieve, since experts with greater reputation can more easily sway the beliefs of decision makers in a desired direction. Thus, higher levels of reputation exacerbate the incentives of biased experts to misreport their private information. Decision makers may therefore be better off consulting less reputable experts when conflicts are more pronounced
A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a 'prior' over...
A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a ‘prior’ over...
Professional experts offer advice with the objective of appearing well informed. Their ability is ev...
We analyze a model of cheap talk in which an expert that faces a conflict of interest with a decisio...
We analyze a model of cheap talk in which an expert who faces a conflict of interest with a decision...
A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a 'prior' over...
We analyze situations in which an expert is biased toward some decision but cares also about his rep...
We analyze situations in which an expert is biased toward some decision but cares also about his rep...
In this paper, we develop a model of a decision maker using an expert to obtain information. The exp...
Abstract: A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a ‘p...
In this paper, we develop a model of a decision maker using an expert to obtain information. The exp...
A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a ‘prior’ over...
This paper examines reputation, the belief of a decision maker about types of advisors, in a two per...
This paper examines reputation, the belief of a decision maker about types of advisors, in a two per...
We develop a reputational cheap talk model where the principal might cancel an action initially reco...
A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a 'prior' over...
A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a ‘prior’ over...
Professional experts offer advice with the objective of appearing well informed. Their ability is ev...
We analyze a model of cheap talk in which an expert that faces a conflict of interest with a decisio...
We analyze a model of cheap talk in which an expert who faces a conflict of interest with a decision...
A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a 'prior' over...
We analyze situations in which an expert is biased toward some decision but cares also about his rep...
We analyze situations in which an expert is biased toward some decision but cares also about his rep...
In this paper, we develop a model of a decision maker using an expert to obtain information. The exp...
Abstract: A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a ‘p...
In this paper, we develop a model of a decision maker using an expert to obtain information. The exp...
A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a ‘prior’ over...
This paper examines reputation, the belief of a decision maker about types of advisors, in a two per...
This paper examines reputation, the belief of a decision maker about types of advisors, in a two per...
We develop a reputational cheap talk model where the principal might cancel an action initially reco...
A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a 'prior' over...
A decision maker is contemplating an action whose outcome is state dependent. She has a ‘prior’ over...
Professional experts offer advice with the objective of appearing well informed. Their ability is ev...