Decision Problems for Partial Specifications: Empirical and Worst-Case Complexities

Partial specifications allow approximate models of systems such as Kripke structures, or labeled transition systems to be created. Using the abstraction possible with these models, an avoidance of the state-space explosion problem is possible, whilst still retaining a structure that can have properties checked over it. A single partial specification abstracts a set of systems, whether Kripke, labeled transition systems, or systems with both atomic propositions and named transitions. This thesis deals in part with problems arising from a desire to efficiently evaluate sentences of the modal μ-calculus over a partial specification. Partial specifications also allow a single system to be modeled by a number of partial specifications, which abstract away different parts of the system. Alternatively, a number of partial specifications may represent different requirements on a system. The thesis also addresses the question of whether a set of partial specifications is consistent, that is to say, whether a single system exists that is abstracted by each member of the set. The effect of nominals, special atomic propositions true on only one state in a system, is also considered on the problem of the consistency of many partial specifications. The thesis also addresses the question of whether the systems a partial specification abstracts are all abstracted by a second partial specification, the problem of inclusion. The thesis demonstrates how commonly used “specification patterns” – useful properties specified in the modal μ-calculus, can be efficiently evaluated over partial specifications, and gives upper and lower complexity bounds on the problems related to sets of partial specifications