Add to ORKGA treatment of recent criticism of judicial review concentrating on its theoretical consistency, scope and the use it makes of factual premises regarding the composition of judicial argument and the practice of democratic assemblies. Focussing on the work of Jeremy Waldron and Mark Tushnet and to a lesser extent that of Thomas Poole, it concludes that there are serious difficulties with the liberal challenge on each front
Judicial supremacy is the new judicial review. From the time Alexander Bickel introduced the term c...
The case I make for judicial review avoids what I, among others, see as the basic flaw in most of th...
This article revisits my argument that structural judicial review – judicial review of those provisi...
A treatment of recent criticism of judicial review concentrating on its theoretical consistency, sc...
Defined as the function of the court to interpret and apply the constitution to particular circumsta...
Phillips and Nicola Lacey to read previous versions of this article. I am very grateful to the edito...
The problem of judicial review turns out to be a number of different problems that should be disag...
American style judicial review, until recently much celebrated for its rendering legislative and exe...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
Recent developments in judicial review have raised the possibility that the debate over judicial sup...
Mark Tushnet has written a great critique of constitutional judicial review. With his sure grasp of ...
The debate over judicial review includes theories that reject, as well as those that endorse, or ar...
A theme of uneasiness, and even of guilt, colors the literature about judicial review. Many of those...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification even though judges may be no ...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
Judicial supremacy is the new judicial review. From the time Alexander Bickel introduced the term c...
The case I make for judicial review avoids what I, among others, see as the basic flaw in most of th...
This article revisits my argument that structural judicial review – judicial review of those provisi...
A treatment of recent criticism of judicial review concentrating on its theoretical consistency, sc...
Defined as the function of the court to interpret and apply the constitution to particular circumsta...
Phillips and Nicola Lacey to read previous versions of this article. I am very grateful to the edito...
The problem of judicial review turns out to be a number of different problems that should be disag...
American style judicial review, until recently much celebrated for its rendering legislative and exe...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
Recent developments in judicial review have raised the possibility that the debate over judicial sup...
Mark Tushnet has written a great critique of constitutional judicial review. With his sure grasp of ...
The debate over judicial review includes theories that reject, as well as those that endorse, or ar...
A theme of uneasiness, and even of guilt, colors the literature about judicial review. Many of those...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification even though judges may be no ...
This article shows that judicial review has a democratic justification, although it is not necessary...
Judicial supremacy is the new judicial review. From the time Alexander Bickel introduced the term c...
The case I make for judicial review avoids what I, among others, see as the basic flaw in most of th...
This article revisits my argument that structural judicial review – judicial review of those provisi...