Abortion In Brazil: A Demographic Approach [aborto No Brasil: Um Enfoque Demográfico]

PURPOSE: to evaluate the prevalence of spontaneous and induced abortion reported by a sample of Brazilian women interviewed in the National Demographic Health Survey of 1996. METHODS: this was a secondary analysis of the Brazilian DHS-96 database, with information from interviews with a representative sample of 12,612 women about their reproductive life, focusing on the prevalence of spontaneous and induced abortion in the last five years and the associated factors for the various regions of the country and for Brazil as a whole. The sampling method was implemented with a strategy selection in two stages, one for the households and the other for women. The prevalence of spontaneous and induced abortion was estimated for Brazil and regions, and the socio-demographic characteristics of the women were analyzed as a function of the abortion's experience. A multinomial regression model analysis was used for the identification of factors independently associated with both types of abortion; their OR and respective 95% CI are reported. RESULTS: the prevalence of reported spontaneous abortion was 14% and the prevalence of induced abortion was 2.4% for the country as a whole. The state with the highest prevalence of induced abortion was Rio de Janeiro with 6.5%, followed by the Northeast region with 3.1%. The places with the lowest prevalence were the state of São Paulo and the South region. Both spontaneous and induced abortion showed higher prevalences with increasing age of the women studied. Being from the urban area (OR=1.5; 95%CI=1.0-2.3), having had more than one live child (OR=2.2; 95%CI=1.5-3.2) and being non-white (OR=1.4; 95%CI=1.0-1.8) were the main risk factors for induced abortion. CONCLUSIONS: the non-modifiable risk factors for induced abortion identified in this study indicate the need for improvement of educational and contraceptive actions, with priority for these specific demographic groups.323105111(2005) Make Every Mother and Child Count, p. 2005. , World Health Organization. World health report, Geneva: WHOSedgh, G., Henshaw, S., Singh, S., Ahman, E., Shah, I.H., Induced abortion: Estimated rates and trends worldwide (2007) Lancet, 370 (9595), pp. 1338-1345Grimes, D.A., Benson, J., Singh, S., Romero, M., Ganatra, B., Okonofua, F.A., Unsafe abortion: The preventable pandemic (2006) Lancet, 368 (9550), pp. 1908-1919Singh, S., Wulf, D., (1996) An Overview of Clandestine Abortion In Latin America, , http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/ib12.pdf, [Internet]. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, cited 2009 Apr 14, Available fromSingh, S., Hospital admissions resulting from unsafe abortion: Estimates from 13 developing countries (2006) Lancet, 368 (9550), pp. 1887-1892Mesce, D., Sines, E., (2006) Unsafe Abortion: Facts & Figures, , Washington, DC: Population Reference BureauKhan, K.S., Wojdyla, D., Say, L., Gülmezoglu, A.M., van Look, P.F., WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: A systematic review (2006) Lancet, 367 (9516), pp. 1066-1074Laurenti, R., Mello, J.M.H.P., Gotlieb, S.L.D., A mortalidade maternal nas capitais brasileiras: Algumas características e estimativas de um fator de ajuste (2004) Rev Bras Epidemiol, 7 (4), pp. 449-460(2008), http://www.amperj.org.br/store/legislacao/codigos/cp_DL2848.pdf, Brasil. Código Penal: Decreto lei n° 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940 [Internet]. Brasília, DF1940, citado, Abr 29, Disponível emWerner, L., (2008) Juiz Autoriza Aborto De Bebê Com Anencefalia, , http://pfdc.pgr.mpf.gov.br/clipping/janeiro-2008/juiz-autoriza-aboro-de-bebe-com-anencefalia, [Internet]. O Estado de São Paulo, Jan 19 [citado 2009 Abr 29]. Disponível emMonteiro, M.F.G., Adesse, L., (2006) Estimativas De Aborto Induzido No Brasil E Grandes Regiões, , http://www.ipas.org.br/arquivos/ml2006.pdf, (1992-2005) [Internet]. Anais do 15o Encontro Nacional de Estudos Populacionais, ABEP, Set 18-22Caxambu, Brasil [citado 2009 Abr 29]. Disponível emOsis, M.J.D., Hardy, E., Faúndes, A., Rodrigues, T., Dificuldades para obter informações da população de mulheres sobre aborto ilegal (1996) Rev Saúde Pública, 30 (5), pp. 444-451Silva, R.S., O uso da técnica de resposta ao azar (TRA) na caracterização do aborto ilegal (1993) Rev Bras Estud Popul, 10 (1-2), pp. 41-56Silva, R.S., O impacto do aborto ilegal na saúde reprodutiva: Sugestões para melhorar a qualidade do dado básico e viabilizar essa análise (1997) Saúde Soc, 6 (1), pp. 53-75Olinto, M.T.A., Moreira, F.D.C., Estimativa de aborto induzido: Comparação entre duas metodologias (2004) Rev Panam Salud Publica, 15 (5), pp. 331-336Aquino, E.M.L., Araújo, M.J., Almeida, M.C., Menezes, G.M., Gravidez na adolescência: A heterogeneidade revelada (2006) O Aprendizado Da Sexualidade: Reprodução E Trajetórias Sociais De Jovens Brasileiros, pp. 310-363. , In: Heilborn ML, Aquino EML, Bozon M, Knauth DR, organizadores, Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz/GaramondMenezes, G.M.S., Aquino, E.M.L., Silva, D.O., Induced abortion during youth: Social inequalities in the outcome of the first pregnancy (2006) Cad Saúde Pública, 22 (7), pp. 1431-1446(1997) Pesquisa Nacional Sobre Demografia E Saúde-1996, , Sociedade Civil Bem-Estar Familiar (BENFAM), Rio de Janeiro: BEMFAMHardy, E., Rebello, I., Rodrigues, T., Moraes, T.M., Aborto provocado: Diferenças entre pensamento e ação (1991) Rev Ginecol Obstet, 2 (3), pp. 111-116de Souza, A.I., Cecatti, J.G., Ferreira, L.O., Santos, L.C., Reasons for hospitalization due to abortion and pregnancy termination (1999) J Trop Pediatr, 45 (1), pp. 31-3