In a paper presented in 1746 Maupertuis communicated the principle of least action as a general and universal principle. He claimed that it could not only explain the laws of motion but also prove the existence of God. He applied the principle to the study of the collision between elastic and inelastic bodies and to the equilibrium of a lever, finding correct results. In this article we present a detailed analysis of Maupertuis' demonstrations and we show that they had serious problems. His mistakes were criticized by d'Alembert and d'Arcy shortly after the publication of his work. Copyright by the Sociedade Brasileira de Física.294625633Roberto de Andrade Martins e Ana Paula Bispo da Silva, Revista. Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica 29, 455 (...
Pierre Costabel : D'Alembert's hesitations in the «traité de dynamique ». The additions inserted by ...
This intellectual biography stands as the definitive account of Maupertuis’s career. His much-public...
The present paper investigates why Logical Empiricists remained silent about one of the most philoso...
The paper deals with Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis’s (1698-1759) writings on the principle of le...
Maupertuis proposed in 1744 the "principle of least action", applying it to the refraction of light....
Without doubt, the principle of least action is a fundamental principle in classical mechanics. Cont...
SUMMARY. — In this paper I discuss relations and differences between the ways in which Maupertuis an...
International audienceIn this paper I discuss relations and differences between the ways in which Ma...
Le principe de moindre action fut découvert dans le domaine de l’optique (Maupertuis) et dans celui ...
The purpose of this dissertation is to defend Pierre Fermat and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz against th...
A new statement of Maupertuis principle of extremal action is contributed on the basis of a constrai...
A new statement of Maupertuis principle of extremal action is contributed on the basis of a constrai...
This is a rare book on a rare topic: it is about 'action' and the Principle of Least Action. A surpr...
International audienceStarting from Hamilton's Principle, the current paper discusses how we can der...
Up to the 1740s, problems of equilibrium and motion of material systems were generally solved by an ...
Pierre Costabel : D'Alembert's hesitations in the «traité de dynamique ». The additions inserted by ...
This intellectual biography stands as the definitive account of Maupertuis’s career. His much-public...
The present paper investigates why Logical Empiricists remained silent about one of the most philoso...
The paper deals with Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis’s (1698-1759) writings on the principle of le...
Maupertuis proposed in 1744 the "principle of least action", applying it to the refraction of light....
Without doubt, the principle of least action is a fundamental principle in classical mechanics. Cont...
SUMMARY. — In this paper I discuss relations and differences between the ways in which Maupertuis an...
International audienceIn this paper I discuss relations and differences between the ways in which Ma...
Le principe de moindre action fut découvert dans le domaine de l’optique (Maupertuis) et dans celui ...
The purpose of this dissertation is to defend Pierre Fermat and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz against th...
A new statement of Maupertuis principle of extremal action is contributed on the basis of a constrai...
A new statement of Maupertuis principle of extremal action is contributed on the basis of a constrai...
This is a rare book on a rare topic: it is about 'action' and the Principle of Least Action. A surpr...
International audienceStarting from Hamilton's Principle, the current paper discusses how we can der...
Up to the 1740s, problems of equilibrium and motion of material systems were generally solved by an ...
Pierre Costabel : D'Alembert's hesitations in the «traité de dynamique ». The additions inserted by ...
This intellectual biography stands as the definitive account of Maupertuis’s career. His much-public...
The present paper investigates why Logical Empiricists remained silent about one of the most philoso...