Optimal Conventional and Unconventional Monetary Policy

在面臨2008年金融危機後嚴峻之需求面衝擊下，多國央行紛紛調降利率，甚至調降至零利率，以期望國家能盡速脫離經濟衰退。在利率調降的過程中，由於受零利率下限的限制，單純藉由傳統貨幣政策之調控，仍可能無法使經濟從嚴峻的需求面衝擊下恢復。因此，非傳統貨幣政策也在美國、日本、英國、歐元區等國家被央行所採行做為對抗經濟衰退的政策工具。在此背景下，我們想了解如何實施最適非傳統貨幣政策。 在最適貨幣政策理論發展中，最適傳統貨幣政策發展較早，因此也較為完備。而在最適非傳統貨幣政策方面，前瞻指引(forward guidance)這項政策工具已被引入最適理論中來進行討論，但量化寬鬆(quantitative easing)直至今日還未被引入最適理論中來討論。 因此，本文建構一個封閉的新興凱因斯模型(New Keynesian)，開創性的將量化寬鬆引入最適貨幣政策理論中，來討論最適傳統與非傳統貨幣政策，也藉此與過去文獻比較施行量化寬鬆與未施行量化寬鬆之影響。After financial crisis occurred in 2008, countries, such as United States of America, United Kingdom, Japan and the euro area, have been mired in slow economic growth, compared with long-term, and have confronted with severe negative demand shocks which can’t be offset by zero interest-rate policy. Under the circumstance where zero lower bound was present, unconventional monetary policy was implemented by central bank of each country to end up the economic recession prospectively. As a result, we are interested in how to implement optimal unconventional monetary policy. The literatures regarding implementing conventional optimal monetary policy under demand shock were developed maturely. Forward guidance, one of unconventional monetary policy, was already developed in field of optimal monetary policy under impacted by demand shock, but quantitative easing has not been conducted in the theory of optimal monetary policy so far. Thus, we construct a close-economy by New Keynesian model to conduct quantitative easing into the theory of optimal monetary policy to discuss the optimal conventional and unconventional monetary policy, and to compare the difference corresponding to the previous literatures which without quantitative easing