半導體製程技術移轉成功因素之研究 -- 以A公司為例

在半導體製造業，製程技術能力代表該廠商產品生產能力與產品成本競爭力。在競爭過程中，企業常透過聯盟等合作方式，自其心儀的夥伴處取得或共同研發高階製程技術，以提高其競爭能力。本研究即在探討半導體製程研發團隊如何在結合外部知識完成製程開發或引進外部製程知識過程中，培養其技術本創新能力。 本研究透過對個案公司A公司的四個半導體製程技術移轉個案的深入分析與探討後，獲得結論大致如下：與技術提供者建立未來的合作關係是企業輸入外部科技知識的目的之一；而在製程技術知識導入後，技術知識接收者的製造系統將融合所引進的製程技術知識，亦可包含管理構面的能力轉移；完整的技術知識移轉應包含技術知識的內化過程；多種能力的成員、技術知識提供者與接收者的共同參與，有助於製程技術引進專案的成功；專案人員的流動率影響組織的知識吸收效果；而專案過程當中，慶祝小成功則有助士氣提升與專案進行；專案過程中，『兼容並蓄』方式引進技術可厚實技術能耐；定期的專案會議，以及工程實驗、原型試製協助專案團隊成員進行技術知識的交流並共同解決問題；而當半導體製程技術引進非以完全複製方式，接收者又不具同類產品製程經驗時，以共同開發進行技術引進較優；最後，當缺乏產品驗證能力時，技術接收者無法判定後續製程開發結果成功與否。In the semiconductor sector, increasing number of enterprises are considering forging alliances or partnerships with each other; as resources are limited and the difficulty of independently competing against each other. Thus most believe that technology capability both represents productivity and cost competitiveness. During competition, enterprise usually enhances it’s competitiveness through co-working with its partners. This research is to discuss how the R&D team completes the technology development and the introduction of creative capability of technology through introduction and application of external knowledge and expertise. This research and analytics reviewed four technology transfer cases in a company A, after research and analysis, we had the following conclusions: after an extended period of time, cooperation with a technology provider was one of the purposes to introduce outside technology knowledge; after technology transfer, the merge of technology and management knowledge would occur in knowledge receiver’s manufacturing system; the whole transition process should include knowledge absorbsion; a project’s success improves when the project was teamed up with multifunction members and with the participation of technology provider; stability and morale of project team members were the key successful factors for knowledge acquisition; problem solving is always through the interaction of project members through routine meeting, experiment, and prototyping; co-development could achieve better result when the receiving end each related process technology knowledge, especially when the exact copy approach is not adopted; and when the technology receiver lacks the capability for product verification, receiving end will not be able to judge the result of the development for ensuring processes