The aim of this article is to discuss a possible argument structure representation for weather verbs (to rain, to snow, to thunder a.o.) in the framework proposed by Hale and Keyser (2002). Starting from the idea that weather verbs sometimes take Agents as subjects, and sometimes Themes, we would like to pr opose that they can be decomposed either as V+N (rain =‘FALL RAIN”), or as CAUSE followed by V+N (‘CAUSE [FALL RAIN]’). The article brings cross-linguistic evidence in favor of this proposal, showing that weather verbs in languages across the world display an ambiguous behavior, sometimes behaving like unaccusatives, and sometimes like unergatives
ABSTRACT Perry contends that an utterance of (1) ‘It is raining’ must be assigned a location before ...
It is widely assumed that meteorological verbs can be considered as unaccusative across the board. T...
The received view about meteorological predicates like ‘rain' is that they comport an argument slot ...
The aim of this article is to discuss a possible argument structure representation for weather verbs...
Weather expressions such as It is raining have proven challenging for linguistic researchers; not on...
In this paper, we would like to argue in favour of the decomposition of weather verbs into light ver...
This work takes the variation in syntactic configurations that precipitation verbs display in non-me...
The received view about meteorological predicates like 'rain' is that they carry an argument slot fo...
This paper evaluates arguments presented by John Perry (and Ken Taylor) in favor of the presence of ...
1.1 Meteorological predicates: the standard view The received view about meteorological predicates l...
This article investigates the nature and occurrence of external arguments of weather verbs in Northe...
This paper addresses the question of the alternation between impersonal and personal constructions w...
Based on an ontological frame for comparative onomasiological lexicology which embeds the RAIN event...
International audience[Introduction] There are few things so rigorously present in human consciousne...
The received view about meteorological predicates like ‘rain' is that they carry an argument slot fo...
ABSTRACT Perry contends that an utterance of (1) ‘It is raining’ must be assigned a location before ...
It is widely assumed that meteorological verbs can be considered as unaccusative across the board. T...
The received view about meteorological predicates like ‘rain' is that they comport an argument slot ...
The aim of this article is to discuss a possible argument structure representation for weather verbs...
Weather expressions such as It is raining have proven challenging for linguistic researchers; not on...
In this paper, we would like to argue in favour of the decomposition of weather verbs into light ver...
This work takes the variation in syntactic configurations that precipitation verbs display in non-me...
The received view about meteorological predicates like 'rain' is that they carry an argument slot fo...
This paper evaluates arguments presented by John Perry (and Ken Taylor) in favor of the presence of ...
1.1 Meteorological predicates: the standard view The received view about meteorological predicates l...
This article investigates the nature and occurrence of external arguments of weather verbs in Northe...
This paper addresses the question of the alternation between impersonal and personal constructions w...
Based on an ontological frame for comparative onomasiological lexicology which embeds the RAIN event...
International audience[Introduction] There are few things so rigorously present in human consciousne...
The received view about meteorological predicates like ‘rain' is that they carry an argument slot fo...
ABSTRACT Perry contends that an utterance of (1) ‘It is raining’ must be assigned a location before ...
It is widely assumed that meteorological verbs can be considered as unaccusative across the board. T...
The received view about meteorological predicates like ‘rain' is that they comport an argument slot ...