In this work, contexts for extended argumentation frameworks (EAF) are defined. A context for an EAF is another framework where original arguments, conflicts and preferences are kept, while introducing new arguments leading to new defeat relations. Thus, the context may interfere with the original classification of arguments, inducing new set of extensions. These semantic change in the outcome of an extended framework in a particular context is characterized, and Dung’s acceptability concept is analyzed on this basis.Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI
We discuss explanations for formal (abstract and structured) argumentation-the question of whether a...
Abstract. Extended Argumentation Frameworks (EAFs) are a recently proposed formalism that develop ab...
We propose a logical encoding of extended abstract argumentation frameworks, that is frameworks with...
In this work, contexts for extended argumentation frameworks (EAF) are defined. A context for an EA...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components remain ...
Change in argumentation frameworks has been widely studied in the recent years. Most of the existing...
Over the last decade, several extensions of Dung's Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs) have been...
Argumentative discourse rarely consists of opinions whose claims apply universally. As with logical ...
In abstract argumentation theory, many argumentation semantics have been proposed for evaluating arg...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for argumentation where some components remains unspec...
Defeat between arguments is a combination of two basic elements: a conflict relation and a preferenc...
Argumentation is an essential part of our daily life both in our individual and our social activitie...
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades wit...
Abstract. Defeat between arguments is established by a combination of two basic elements: a conflict...
One of the most prominent tools for abstract argumentation is the Dung's framework, AF for short. Al...
We discuss explanations for formal (abstract and structured) argumentation-the question of whether a...
Abstract. Extended Argumentation Frameworks (EAFs) are a recently proposed formalism that develop ab...
We propose a logical encoding of extended abstract argumentation frameworks, that is frameworks with...
In this work, contexts for extended argumentation frameworks (EAF) are defined. A context for an EA...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components remain ...
Change in argumentation frameworks has been widely studied in the recent years. Most of the existing...
Over the last decade, several extensions of Dung's Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs) have been...
Argumentative discourse rarely consists of opinions whose claims apply universally. As with logical ...
In abstract argumentation theory, many argumentation semantics have been proposed for evaluating arg...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for argumentation where some components remains unspec...
Defeat between arguments is a combination of two basic elements: a conflict relation and a preferenc...
Argumentation is an essential part of our daily life both in our individual and our social activitie...
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades wit...
Abstract. Defeat between arguments is established by a combination of two basic elements: a conflict...
One of the most prominent tools for abstract argumentation is the Dung's framework, AF for short. Al...
We discuss explanations for formal (abstract and structured) argumentation-the question of whether a...
Abstract. Extended Argumentation Frameworks (EAFs) are a recently proposed formalism that develop ab...
We propose a logical encoding of extended abstract argumentation frameworks, that is frameworks with...