In this research line we are exploring the possibility of having multiple preference criteria to compare arguments in in Defeasible Argumentation. In this work we are assuming a goaloriented Argumentative System, to which an application or an agent may seek an answer in response to a query. Thus, based on the current knowledge available, the system will decide whether there exists undefeated support for that query.Eje: Inteligencia artificialRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI
We define an abstract argumentation framework that includes a binary symmetric relation representing...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components remain ...
International audienceDung's argumentation framework has been extended to consider preferences over ...
In this research line we are exploring the possibility of having multiple preference criteria to com...
In this research line we are exploring the possibility of having multiple preference criteria to com...
Argumentation is an attractive reasoning mechanism due to its dialectical and non monotonic nature, ...
Argumentation is a reasoning mechanism of dialectical and non-monotonic na- ture, with useful prope...
As a practical mechanism for formalizing commonsense reasoning, argumentation has shown its potentia...
Argumentation is a reasoning mechanism attractive due to its dialectical and non monotonic nature, a...
Defeat between arguments is a combination of two basic elements: a conflict relation and a preferenc...
In this work we show a possible form of classification of comparison methods in argumentation system...
In our current society, it is very common to have access to a huge amount of information and scenari...
In the last decade several ways to formalize defeasible reasoning have been studied. A particular ap...
Abstract. Argumentation is a reasoning mechanism attractive due to its dialectical and non monotonic...
Recommender Systems based on argumentation represent an important proposal where the recommendation ...
We define an abstract argumentation framework that includes a binary symmetric relation representing...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components remain ...
International audienceDung's argumentation framework has been extended to consider preferences over ...
In this research line we are exploring the possibility of having multiple preference criteria to com...
In this research line we are exploring the possibility of having multiple preference criteria to com...
Argumentation is an attractive reasoning mechanism due to its dialectical and non monotonic nature, ...
Argumentation is a reasoning mechanism of dialectical and non-monotonic na- ture, with useful prope...
As a practical mechanism for formalizing commonsense reasoning, argumentation has shown its potentia...
Argumentation is a reasoning mechanism attractive due to its dialectical and non monotonic nature, a...
Defeat between arguments is a combination of two basic elements: a conflict relation and a preferenc...
In this work we show a possible form of classification of comparison methods in argumentation system...
In our current society, it is very common to have access to a huge amount of information and scenari...
In the last decade several ways to formalize defeasible reasoning have been studied. A particular ap...
Abstract. Argumentation is a reasoning mechanism attractive due to its dialectical and non monotonic...
Recommender Systems based on argumentation represent an important proposal where the recommendation ...
We define an abstract argumentation framework that includes a binary symmetric relation representing...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components remain ...
International audienceDung's argumentation framework has been extended to consider preferences over ...