Objective: To quantify the effect of strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.<p></p> Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.<p></p> Data sources Sources searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, DARE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, C2-SPECTR, ERIC, PreMEDLINE, Cochrane Methodology Register, Current Controlled Trials metaRegister, WHO trials platform, Society for Clinical Trials (SCT) conference proceedings and a survey of all UK clinical trial research units.<p></p> Review: methods Included trials were randomised evaluations of strategies to improve retention embedded within host randomised trials. The primary outcome was retention of trial participants. Data from trials were pooled using the fixed-effect model. Subgroup analyses we...
Background: Non-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial result...
BACKGROUND: Poor retention in randomised trials can lead to serious consequences to their validity. ...
This review is an abridged version of a Cochrane Review previously published in the Cochrane Databas...
Objective: To quantify the effect of strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.<p>&...
Background: Loss to follow-up from randomised trials can introduce bias and reduce study power, affe...
Objective: To quantify the effect of strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.Design: Sy...
Abstract Background Randomised control trials are regarded as the gold standard for evaluating the e...
This research was supported by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government’s Health and So...
OBJECTIVE: To develop best practice guidance for the use of retention strategies in randomised clini...
Funding: This research is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government’s Health a...
BACKGROUND: Non-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial result...
Aim To review the cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve participant recruitment and retention ...
Objective To explore the strategies used to improve retention in primary care randomised trials.<...
Background: Non-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial result...
BACKGROUND: Poor retention in randomised trials can lead to serious consequences to their validity. ...
This review is an abridged version of a Cochrane Review previously published in the Cochrane Databas...
Objective: To quantify the effect of strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.<p>&...
Background: Loss to follow-up from randomised trials can introduce bias and reduce study power, affe...
Objective: To quantify the effect of strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.Design: Sy...
Abstract Background Randomised control trials are regarded as the gold standard for evaluating the e...
This research was supported by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government’s Health and So...
OBJECTIVE: To develop best practice guidance for the use of retention strategies in randomised clini...
Funding: This research is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government’s Health a...
BACKGROUND: Non-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial result...
Aim To review the cost-effectiveness of strategies to improve participant recruitment and retention ...
Objective To explore the strategies used to improve retention in primary care randomised trials.<...
Background: Non-retention of participants seriously affects the credibility of clinical trial result...
BACKGROUND: Poor retention in randomised trials can lead to serious consequences to their validity. ...
This review is an abridged version of a Cochrane Review previously published in the Cochrane Databas...