Here we correct a factor of 2 missed in one of figures and the corresponding sentence in the text. It does not change any conclusions
Erratum to: Eur. Phys. J. C (2019) 79:277 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6774-8 In this ar...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 6. The correct figure is given below. (figu...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 6. The correct figure is given below. (figu...
Here we correct a factor of 2 missed in one of figures and the corresponding sentence in the text. I...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
This document corrects two errors in Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) no. 8, 56: the incorrect referencing o...
The original PDF version of this article was revised as theOpen Access license text was missing and ...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 6. The correct figure is given below. (figu...
his Erratum replaces incorrect plots shown in Fig. 7 with the corrected ones. In the publication, th...
The top plot shown in figure 3 of ref. [1] is the result of 8 TeV. The correct figure is given below...
Erratum to: Eur. Phys. J. C (2019) 79:277 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6774-8 In this ar...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 6. The correct figure is given below. (figu...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 6. The correct figure is given below. (figu...
Here we correct a factor of 2 missed in one of figures and the corresponding sentence in the text. I...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
We have identified a mistake in how Fig. 1 is referenced in the text of the article Eur. Phys. J. C ...
This document corrects two errors in Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017) no. 8, 56: the incorrect referencing o...
The original PDF version of this article was revised as theOpen Access license text was missing and ...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 6. The correct figure is given below. (figu...
his Erratum replaces incorrect plots shown in Fig. 7 with the corrected ones. In the publication, th...
The top plot shown in figure 3 of ref. [1] is the result of 8 TeV. The correct figure is given below...
Erratum to: Eur. Phys. J. C (2019) 79:277 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6774-8 In this ar...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 6. The correct figure is given below. (figu...
In the original paper, the wrong plot was used in figure 6. The correct figure is given below. (figu...