Add to ORKGProposals in Scottish Executive consultation paper, Redressing the Balance, to prevent accused personally cross examining complainers in sexual offences trials and whether such reform would breach right to fair trial under Art.6 ECHR
Taking up a Chapter of its own in the Law Commission’s mammoth Evidence in Sexual Offences Prosecuti...
In H.M. Advocate v. Grimmond 1 the judge in a Scottish High Court trial refused permission for exper...
This presents the findings from an evaluation of changes to the law of evidence in sex offence trial...
The recently published Heads of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Bill 2014 finally shed some limit...
The cross-examination of complainants of sexual offences is a contentious issue. In one sense, it ma...
SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:m00/45988 / BLDSC - British Library D...
This study constitutes the largest empirical study of the use of previous sexual behaviour evidence ...
Cross-examination is fundamental to the adversarial criminal trial. However, when children and witne...
In March 2018, Northern Ireland was divided by the acquittal of four men for rape, attempted rape, e...
With its reputation as the greatest legal engine ever invented cross-examination rarely receives c...
Sexual offending has always been a crime that is difficult to prosecute. Despite efforts to reform t...
The admissibility of a complainant's sexual experience evidence1 during a sexual offence trial has l...
RCS commissioned this research against a backdrop where there have been long standing concerns about...
Research continues to raise concerns over the treatment of rape complainants at trial, despite the n...
Comments on key proposals in the Scottish Law Commission Report on Rape and Other Sexual Offences. S...
Taking up a Chapter of its own in the Law Commission’s mammoth Evidence in Sexual Offences Prosecuti...
In H.M. Advocate v. Grimmond 1 the judge in a Scottish High Court trial refused permission for exper...
This presents the findings from an evaluation of changes to the law of evidence in sex offence trial...
The recently published Heads of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences) Bill 2014 finally shed some limit...
The cross-examination of complainants of sexual offences is a contentious issue. In one sense, it ma...
SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:m00/45988 / BLDSC - British Library D...
This study constitutes the largest empirical study of the use of previous sexual behaviour evidence ...
Cross-examination is fundamental to the adversarial criminal trial. However, when children and witne...
In March 2018, Northern Ireland was divided by the acquittal of four men for rape, attempted rape, e...
With its reputation as the greatest legal engine ever invented cross-examination rarely receives c...
Sexual offending has always been a crime that is difficult to prosecute. Despite efforts to reform t...
The admissibility of a complainant's sexual experience evidence1 during a sexual offence trial has l...
RCS commissioned this research against a backdrop where there have been long standing concerns about...
Research continues to raise concerns over the treatment of rape complainants at trial, despite the n...
Comments on key proposals in the Scottish Law Commission Report on Rape and Other Sexual Offences. S...
Taking up a Chapter of its own in the Law Commission’s mammoth Evidence in Sexual Offences Prosecuti...
In H.M. Advocate v. Grimmond 1 the judge in a Scottish High Court trial refused permission for exper...
This presents the findings from an evaluation of changes to the law of evidence in sex offence trial...