Debate is ongoing about the nature and use of evidence in public health decision making, and there seems to be an emerging consensus that the "hierarchy of evidence" may be difficult to apply in other settings. It may be unhelpful however to simply abandon the hierarchy without having a framework or guide to replace it. One such framework is discussed. This is based around a matrix, and emphasises the need to match research questions to specific types of research. This emphasis on methodological appropriateness, and on typologies rather than hierarchies of evidence may be helpful in organising and appraising public health evidence
bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine 218 ABSTRACT Proponents of evidence-based...
This article examines the hierarchy of evidence (HoE) framework and evidence-based practice for clin...
Dietary guidelines should be underpinned by high-quality evidence. Quality assessment methods that r...
Debate is ongoing about the nature and use of evidence in public health decision making, and there s...
• A number of hierarchies of evidence have been developed to enable different research methods to be...
Drawing on the long tradition of evidence-based medicine that aims to improve the efficiency and eff...
Hierarchies of evidence are an important and influential tool for appraising evidence in medicine. I...
Within public health, and increasingly other areas of social policy, there are widespread calls to i...
Evidence hierarchies are investigative strategies ordered with regard to the claimed strength of evi...
Objective: The objective of this study is to outline explicit criteria for assessing the contributio...
Improving the evidence in public health is an important goal for the health promotion community. Wit...
This paper discusses the hierarchy of evidence for health and social care in relation to equine assi...
Policymakers seeking empirical evidence on social policy interventions often find themselves confron...
Background: In 1999 a four-level hierarchy of evidence was promoted by the National Health and Medic...
Within the field of public health, and increasingly across other areas of social policy, there are w...
bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine 218 ABSTRACT Proponents of evidence-based...
This article examines the hierarchy of evidence (HoE) framework and evidence-based practice for clin...
Dietary guidelines should be underpinned by high-quality evidence. Quality assessment methods that r...
Debate is ongoing about the nature and use of evidence in public health decision making, and there s...
• A number of hierarchies of evidence have been developed to enable different research methods to be...
Drawing on the long tradition of evidence-based medicine that aims to improve the efficiency and eff...
Hierarchies of evidence are an important and influential tool for appraising evidence in medicine. I...
Within public health, and increasingly other areas of social policy, there are widespread calls to i...
Evidence hierarchies are investigative strategies ordered with regard to the claimed strength of evi...
Objective: The objective of this study is to outline explicit criteria for assessing the contributio...
Improving the evidence in public health is an important goal for the health promotion community. Wit...
This paper discusses the hierarchy of evidence for health and social care in relation to equine assi...
Policymakers seeking empirical evidence on social policy interventions often find themselves confron...
Background: In 1999 a four-level hierarchy of evidence was promoted by the National Health and Medic...
Within the field of public health, and increasingly across other areas of social policy, there are w...
bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine 218 ABSTRACT Proponents of evidence-based...
This article examines the hierarchy of evidence (HoE) framework and evidence-based practice for clin...
Dietary guidelines should be underpinned by high-quality evidence. Quality assessment methods that r...