Healey (2019a) makes four comments on my (Park, 2019a) objections to van Fraassen’s positions. The four comments concern the issues of whether ‘disbelief’ is appropriate or inappropriate to characterize van Fraassen’s position, what the relationship between a theory and models is for van Fraassen, whether he believes or not that a theory is empirically adequate, and whether destructive empiricism is tenable or not. I reply to those comments in this paper
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Pov...
According to Bas van Fraassen, scientific realists and anti-realists disagree about whether acceptin...
Van Fraassen (2007, 2017) consistently uses the English view of rationality to parry criticisms from...
Healey (2019a) makes four comments on my (Park, 2019a) objections to van Fraassen’s positions. The f...
Healey (2019a) makes four comments on my (Park, 2019a) objections to van Fraassen???s positions. The...
Constructive empiricism implies that if van Fraassen does not believe that scientific theories and h...
Seungbae Park argues that Bas van Fraassen’s rejection of inference to the best explanation (IBE) is...
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Pov...
Van Fraassen contends that there is no argument that rationally compels us to disbelieve a successfu...
Van Fraassen (2007, 2017) consistently uses the English view of rationality to parry criticisms from...
Psillos has recently argued that van Fraassen’s arguments against abduction fail. Moreover, he claim...
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Pov...
According to Bas van Fraassen, scientific realists and anti-realists disagree about whether acceptin...
Van Fraassen (2007, 2017) consistently uses the English view of rationality to parry criticisms from...
Healey (2019a) makes four comments on my (Park, 2019a) objections to van Fraassen’s positions. The f...
Healey (2019a) makes four comments on my (Park, 2019a) objections to van Fraassen???s positions. The...
Constructive empiricism implies that if van Fraassen does not believe that scientific theories and h...
Seungbae Park argues that Bas van Fraassen’s rejection of inference to the best explanation (IBE) is...
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Pov...
Van Fraassen contends that there is no argument that rationally compels us to disbelieve a successfu...
Van Fraassen (2007, 2017) consistently uses the English view of rationality to parry criticisms from...
Psillos has recently argued that van Fraassen’s arguments against abduction fail. Moreover, he claim...
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Pov...
According to Bas van Fraassen, scientific realists and anti-realists disagree about whether acceptin...
Van Fraassen (2007, 2017) consistently uses the English view of rationality to parry criticisms from...