The recent literature in philosophy of biology has drawn attention to the different sorts of explanations proffered in the biological sciences—we have molecular, biomedical, and evolutionary explanations. Do these explanations all have a common structure or relation that they seek to capture? This paper will answer in the negative. I defend a pluralistic and pragmatic approach to explanation. Using examples from classical population genetics, I argue that formal demonstrations, and even strictly “mathematical truths,” may serve as explanatory in different historical contexts
Evolutionary biology is a field currently animated by much discussion concerning its conceptual foun...
Dobzhansky (1964) stated that “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution,” and...
Cultural change constitutes a Darwinian evolutionary process, comprising the three Darwinian princip...
The recent literature in philosophy of biology has drawn attention to the different sorts of explana...
Journal ArticleThe recent literature in Philosophy; of biology has drawn attention to the different ...
Population geneticists investigate the conditions for the possibility of evolution. They use mathema...
Population genetics attempts to measure the influence of the causes of evolution, viz., mutation, mi...
This article presents a challenge that those philosophers who deny the causal interpretation of expl...
Explanations in genetics have intriguing aspects to both biologists and philosophers, and there is n...
Darwin’s theory of natural selection was not widely accepted in the biological community until its s...
Current accounts of the relationship between classical genetics and molecular biology favor the ‘exp...
A strong case has been made for the role and value of mechanistic reasoning in process-oriented scie...
Classical genetics and its relation to molecular biology have been subject to extensive philosophica...
In 1966, Richard Levins argued that there are different strategies in model building in population b...
A recent debate over the causal foundations of evolutionary theory pits those who believe that natur...
Evolutionary biology is a field currently animated by much discussion concerning its conceptual foun...
Dobzhansky (1964) stated that “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution,” and...
Cultural change constitutes a Darwinian evolutionary process, comprising the three Darwinian princip...
The recent literature in philosophy of biology has drawn attention to the different sorts of explana...
Journal ArticleThe recent literature in Philosophy; of biology has drawn attention to the different ...
Population geneticists investigate the conditions for the possibility of evolution. They use mathema...
Population genetics attempts to measure the influence of the causes of evolution, viz., mutation, mi...
This article presents a challenge that those philosophers who deny the causal interpretation of expl...
Explanations in genetics have intriguing aspects to both biologists and philosophers, and there is n...
Darwin’s theory of natural selection was not widely accepted in the biological community until its s...
Current accounts of the relationship between classical genetics and molecular biology favor the ‘exp...
A strong case has been made for the role and value of mechanistic reasoning in process-oriented scie...
Classical genetics and its relation to molecular biology have been subject to extensive philosophica...
In 1966, Richard Levins argued that there are different strategies in model building in population b...
A recent debate over the causal foundations of evolutionary theory pits those who believe that natur...
Evolutionary biology is a field currently animated by much discussion concerning its conceptual foun...
Dobzhansky (1964) stated that “Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution,” and...
Cultural change constitutes a Darwinian evolutionary process, comprising the three Darwinian princip...