Add to ORKGIn this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad Wray, Sarah Green, Alexander Bird, and Timothy Lyons. These articles contain a number of objections and suggestions concerning systematicity theory, as developed in my book ystematicity: The Nature of Science (Oxford UP, 2013)
The Temporal Structure of Scientific Consensus Formation (Shwed and Bearman 2010) developed a proced...
In this article I reply to comments made by Agustin Vicente and Giridhari Lal Pandit on Science and ...
We are addressing this letter to the editors of Philosophical Psychology after reading an article th...
In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad ...
This letter is a response to a guide to performing systematic reviews which points out several signi...
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Goldstein et al.’s (2017) attempted ...
Author's response to: Pablo Schyfter, 'Inaccurate Ambitions and Missing Methodologies: Thoughts on J...
I want to thank all the contributors for their thoughtful comments on the book, Brown, J. (2018). Fa...
I attempt to respond to the many questions and objections raised by the commentaries. The responses ...
Science has striven to do better since its inception and has given us good philosophies, methodologi...
Journal ArticleThe preceding Comment [1] on my Letter [2] and Haldane?s Letter [3] cites three old p...
This essay responds to a review of my book Wittgenstein Flies A Kite: A Story of Models of Wings and...
Systematicity theory—developed and articulated by Paul Hoyningen-Huene—and scientific realism consti...
Foucault’s philosophy and history of science(s) offer contradictory suggestions. His history of scie...
Research in foundations of physics is stagnant, as claimed by many scientists during the last years....
The Temporal Structure of Scientific Consensus Formation (Shwed and Bearman 2010) developed a proced...
In this article I reply to comments made by Agustin Vicente and Giridhari Lal Pandit on Science and ...
We are addressing this letter to the editors of Philosophical Psychology after reading an article th...
In this article, I reply to the preceding articles by Naomi Oreskes, Chrysostomos Mantzavinos, Brad ...
This letter is a response to a guide to performing systematic reviews which points out several signi...
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to Goldstein et al.’s (2017) attempted ...
Author's response to: Pablo Schyfter, 'Inaccurate Ambitions and Missing Methodologies: Thoughts on J...
I want to thank all the contributors for their thoughtful comments on the book, Brown, J. (2018). Fa...
I attempt to respond to the many questions and objections raised by the commentaries. The responses ...
Science has striven to do better since its inception and has given us good philosophies, methodologi...
Journal ArticleThe preceding Comment [1] on my Letter [2] and Haldane?s Letter [3] cites three old p...
This essay responds to a review of my book Wittgenstein Flies A Kite: A Story of Models of Wings and...
Systematicity theory—developed and articulated by Paul Hoyningen-Huene—and scientific realism consti...
Foucault’s philosophy and history of science(s) offer contradictory suggestions. His history of scie...
Research in foundations of physics is stagnant, as claimed by many scientists during the last years....
The Temporal Structure of Scientific Consensus Formation (Shwed and Bearman 2010) developed a proced...
In this article I reply to comments made by Agustin Vicente and Giridhari Lal Pandit on Science and ...
We are addressing this letter to the editors of Philosophical Psychology after reading an article th...