General repercussion in extraordinary appeals and the role of the ?amicus curiae?.

O artigo comenta decis?o monocr?tica da Ministra Rosa Weber, do STF, dada no julgamento do RE 592.891 acerca da admissibilidade de entidades como ?amicus curiae?. Avalia-se a repercuss?o geral como novo requisito do Recurso Extraordin?rio bem como o uso do ?amicus curiae? nesses processos. Para isso s?o expostos e discutidos a origem e os requisitos ? admiss?o dos requerentes e ainda o papel e a import?ncia do ?amicus curiae? na jurisdi??o brasileira. Defende-se que o STF deve dar interpreta??o aberta ? possibilidade de ingresso do ?amicus curiae? como forma de pluralizar o debate, respeitar o contradit?rio e, com isso, proporcionar uma decis?o com maior corre??o.This article comments on a precedent ruled by the Brazilian Supreme Court on the RE 592.891 about the admissibility of entities as ?amici curiae?. It evaluates general repercussion in extraordinary appeals as a new requirement and debates the use of an ?amicus curiae? in these cases. For that purpose it expounds and discusses the origin and requirements for the admission of applicants and also the role and importance of the ?amicus curiae? in Brazilian courts. It argues that the Brazilian Supreme Court should give an interpretation which is open to the possibility of accepting the ?amicus curiae? as a way to pluralize debates, to respect the adversary system and, thus, to provide a more correct decision