EFEKTIVITAS PENERAPAN PASAL 51 PERATURAN DAERAH KABUPATEN MALANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2010 TENTANG PENGENDALIAN PENCEMARAN DAN KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Malang)

Hafiz Kendratama, Dr. Istislam., S.H., M.Hum., Dr. Moh. Fadli S.H.,M.Hum.Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat keefektifan terhadap penegakan sanksi administrasi yang diberikan oleh Dinas Lingkungan Hidup kepada perusahaan pembuang limbah yang menyebabkan terjadinya pencemaran lingkungan. Sesuai dengan Peraturan Daerah Nomor 7 Tahuni2010 tentangiPengendalian Pencemaran dan Kerusakan Lingkungan Hidup Pasal 51 ayat (2), dijelaskan pada pasal tersebut bahwa sanksi administrasi lingkungan berupa teguran tertulis, paksaan pemerintah, pembekuan izin dan pencabutan izin lingkungan. Bermula dari keluhan warga disepanjang aliran sungai yang terganggu dengan tercemarnya sungai maka Dinas Lingkungan Hidup turun ke lapangan untuk meninjau keadaan, dari pemeriksaan awal tersebut maka dicurigai terdapat perusahaan yang dicurigai membuang air hasil pengolahan limbah ke sungai tersebut, kemudian dilakukan investigasi dan ditemukan satu perusahaan yang terbukti membuang limbah ke sungai yaitu perusahaan pembuat minuman ringan PT.SNC dengan produknya yang yaitu kertas belum jadi. Langkah pertama yang dilakukan oleh Dinas Lingkungan Hidup yaitu memberikan pendampingan berupa tindakan penanggulangan serta edukasi tentang penanganan limbah dan memberikan saran agar pengolahan limbah di lakukan oleh pihak ketiga, selain itu dinas lingkungan hidup memberikan masukan agar perusahaan menyediakan tepat IPAL (Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah) untuk menampung dan mengolah air limbah, tetapi keadaan saat itu permintaan akan kertas hasil produksi PT. SNC sangat tinggi maka kegiatan produksi juga sangat tinggi, otomatis produksi juga tinggi yang menyebabkan jumlah limbah juga tinggi dan daya tampung tidak muat, dan terjadi kembali pencemaran tersebut di buang disungai Dinas Lingkungan Hidup memutuskan untuk memberi sanksi administrasi berupa teguran tertulis, dengan berjalannya waktu ternyata hal tersebut kurang maksimal akhrinya dinas lingkungan hidup memberikan sanksi teguran tertulis kedua kalinya, dan akhirnya dianggap pencemaran tersebut telah berhenti. Tetapi keadaan dilapangan ternyata berbeda dengan yang diharapkan, pencemaran tersebut masih terjadi meskipun jumlahnya berkurang tidak seperti yang terjadi pada tahun 2015. Kata Kunci: Efektifitas, Penegakan Sanksi Administrasi, Pencemaran Lingkungan. ABSTRACT This research aims to identify whether there is an effectiveness on the enforcement of administrative sanctions given by Environmental Agency to Waste Disposal Company that caused environmental pollution. According to the Local Regulation of Malang Regency Number 7 of 2010 on Control of Environmental Pollution and Destruction, Article 51 Paragraph (2) explains that environmental administrative sanction, can be formed in written reprimand, government coercion, suspension and revocation of environmental licence. Starting from complaining of society, especially along river, that was disturbed by polluted river, so Environmental Agency conducted inspection to observe the situation. From the first inspection, some companies was suspected for throwing water waste to the river. Then investigation was conducted and it was founded one company that proof threw waste to the river which is the company of beverage, PT.SNC, through its product,the unfinished paper . The first step was conducted by Environmental Agency is giving assistances, such as preventive action and education on waste management, as well as giving advice of waste management which was conducted by third party. Furthermore, Environmental Agency gave advice to the company for providing properly Installation of Water Waste Management to retain and manage water waste. In this situation, however, the demand of paper production from PT. SNC was very high, therefore the production activity was high as well. Automatically, the production was high that caused the waste was also high and the volume was not enough. The pollution happened again in the river. The Environmental Agency decided to give administrative sanctions in the form of written reprimand. By the time, it was not effectively enough. In the end, the Environmental Agency gave written reprimand for the second time and seems that the pollution was stopped. However, the condition in the field is different than it was expected. The Pollution still happens, even the amount was decreased which was not as much as happened in 2015. Keywords: Effectiveness, Enforcement of Administrative Sanctions, Environmental PollutionÂ