A plant-wide energy model for wastewater treatment plants: application to anaerobic membrane bioreactor technology

[EN] The aim of this study is to propose a detailed and comprehensive plant-wide model for assessing the energy demand of different wastewater treatment systems (beyond the traditional activated sludge) in both steady- and unsteady-state conditions. The proposed model makes it possible to calculate power and heat requirements (W and Q, respectively), and to recover both power and heat from methane and hydrogen capture. In order to account for the effect of biological processes on heat requirements, the model has been coupled to the extended version of the BNRM2 plant-wide mathematical model, which is implemented in DESSAS simulation software. Two case studies have been evaluated to assess the model's performance: (1) modelling the energy demand of two urban wastewater treatment plants based on conventional activated sludge and submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) technologies in steady-state conditions and (2) modelling the dynamics of reactor temperature and heat requirements in an AnMBR plant in unsteady-state conditions. The results indicate that the proposed model can be used to assess the energy performance of different wastewater treatment processes and would thus be useful, for example, WWTP design or upgrading or the development of new control strategies for energy savings.This research work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [MICINN, Project CTM2011-28595-C02-01/02] jointly with the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).Pretel-Jolis, R.; Robles Martínez, Á.; Ruano García, MV.; Seco, A.; Ferrer, J. (2016). A plant-wide energy model for wastewater treatment plants: application to anaerobic membrane bioreactor technology. Environmental Technology. 37(18):2298-2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1148903229823153718Olsson, G., Carlsson, B., Comas, J., Copp, J., Gernaey, K. V., Ingildsen, P., … Åmand, L. (2014). Instrumentation, control and automation in wastewater – from London 1973 to Narbonne 2013. Water Science and Technology, 69(7), 1373-1385. doi:10.2166/wst.2014.057Nicolae, B., & George-Vlad, B. (2015). Life cycle analysis in refurbishment of the buildings as intervention practices in energy saving. Energy and Buildings, 86, 74-85. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.021Corominas, L., Foley, J., Guest, J. S., Hospido, A., Larsen, H. F., Morera, S., & Shaw, A. (2013). Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: State of the art. Water Research, 47(15), 5480-5492. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.049Bauer, A., Bösch, P., Friedl, A., & Amon, T. (2009). Analysis of methane potentials of steam-exploded wheat straw and estimation of energy yields of combined ethanol and methane production. Journal of Biotechnology, 142(1), 50-55. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.01.017Venkatesh, G., & Elmi, R. A. (2013). Economic–environmental analysis of handling biogas from sewage sludge digesters in WWTPs (wastewater treatment plants) for energy recovery: Case study of Bekkelaget WWTP in Oslo (Norway). Energy, 58, 220-235. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.05.025EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). Combined Heat and Power Partnership. Agency of the United States federal government; 2015.Descoins, N., Deleris, S., Lestienne, R., Trouvé, E., & Maréchal, F. (2012). Energy efficiency in waste water treatments plants: Optimization of activated sludge process coupled with anaerobic digestion. Energy, 41(1), 153-164. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.078Gernaey, K. V., van Loosdrecht, M. C. ., Henze, M., Lind, M., & Jørgensen, S. B. (2004). Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19(9), 763-783. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.03.005Ferrer, J., Seco, A., Serralta, J., Ribes, J., Manga, J., Asensi, E., … Llavador, F. (2008). DESASS: A software tool for designing, simulating and optimising WWTPs. Environmental Modelling & Software, 23(1), 19-26. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.04.005Bozkurt, H., Quaglia, A., Gernaey, K. V., & Sin, G. (2015). A mathematical programming framework for early stage design of wastewater treatment plants. Environmental Modelling & Software, 64, 164-176. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.11.023Jeppsson, U., Rosen, C., Alex, J., Copp, J., Gernaey, K. V., Pons, M.-N., & Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2006). Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs. Water Science and Technology, 53(1), 287-295. doi:10.2166/wst.2006.031Gomez, J., de Gracia, M., Ayesa, E., & Garcia-Heras, J. L. (2007). Mathematical modelling of autothermal thermophilic aerobic digesters. Water Research, 41(5), 959-968. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.042Righi, S., Oliviero, L., Pedrini, M., Buscaroli, A., & Della Casa, C. (2013). Life Cycle Assessment of management systems for sewage sludge and food waste: centralized and decentralized approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 44, 8-17. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.004Lemos, D., Dias, A. C., Gabarrell, X., & Arroja, L. (2013). Environmental assessment of an urban water system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 54, 157-165. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.029Nowak, O., Enderle, P., & Varbanov, P. (2015). Ways to optimize the energy balance of municipal wastewater systems: lessons learned from Austrian applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 88, 125-131. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.068Tous M, Ladislav B, Houdková L, Pavlas M, Stehlík P. Waste-to energy (W2E) software – a support tool for decision making process. Brno University of Technology, Institute of Process and Environmental Engineering, Chemical Engineering Transactions, Volume 18; 2009.Pijáková, I. (2015). Application of Dynamic Simulations for Assessment of Urban Wastewater Systems Operation. Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly Journal, 29(1), 55-62. doi:10.15255/cabeq.2014.2127McCarty, P. L., Bae, J., & Kim, J. (2011). Domestic Wastewater Treatment as a Net Energy Producer–Can This be Achieved? Environmental Science & Technology, 45(17), 7100-7106. doi:10.1021/es2014264Giménez, J. B., Robles, A., Carretero, L., Durán, F., Ruano, M. V., Gatti, M. N., … Seco, A. (2011). Experimental study of the anaerobic urban wastewater treatment in a submerged hollow-fibre membrane bioreactor at pilot scale. Bioresource Technology, 102(19), 8799-8806. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.014Smith, A. L., Stadler, L. B., Cao, L., Love, N. G., Raskin, L., & Skerlos, S. J. (2014). Navigating Wastewater Energy Recovery Strategies: A Life Cycle Comparison of Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor and Conventional Treatment Systems with Anaerobic Digestion. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(10), 5972-5981. doi:10.1021/es5006169Barat, R., Serralta, J., Ruano, M. V., Jiménez, E., Ribes, J., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2013). Biological Nutrient Removal Model No. 2 (BNRM2): a general model for wastewater treatment plants. Water Science and Technology, 67(7), 1481-1489. doi:10.2166/wst.2013.004Durán F. Mathematical modelling of the anaerobic urban wastewater treatment including sulphate-reducing bacteria. Application to an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (Modelación matemática del tratamiento anaerobio de aguas residuales urbanas incluyendo las bacterias sulfatorreductoras, Aplicación a un biorreactor anaerobio de membranas), Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Hydraulic Engineering and Environment, Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain; 2013.Pretel, R., Robles, A., Ruano, M. V., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2013). Environmental impact of submerged anaerobic MBR (SAnMBR) technology used to treat urban wastewater at different temperatures. Bioresource Technology, 149, 532-540. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.060Gillot, S., & Vanrolleghem, P. A. (2003). Equilibrium temperature in aerated basins—comparison of two prediction models. Water Research, 37(15), 3742-3748. doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(03)00263-xEPA. Catalog of Biomass Combined Heat and Power Catalog of Technologies; 2007 [cited 2015 May 5] Available from: http://www.epa.gov/chp/documents/biomass_chp_catalog.pdf.PSE Probiogas. Development of sustainable systems of biogas production and use in Spain. Funded by the Ministry of science and innovation. Spanish government, Madrid; 2010 [cited 2012 May 5] http://213.229.136.11/bases/ainia_probiogas.nsf/0/F9F832A77BF0CA25C125753F0058C4B2/$FILE/Cap2.pdf.Serralta, J., Ferrer, J., Borrás, L., & Seco, A. (2004). An extension of ASM2d including pH calculation. Water Research, 38(19), 4029-4038. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2004.07.009Chanona, J., Ribes, J., Seco, A., & Ferrer, J. (2006). Optimum design and operation of primary sludge fermentation schemes for volatile fatty acids production. Water Research, 40(1), 53-60. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.10.020Gatti MN. Characterization of wastewaters and calibration of the mathematical model BNRM1 for simulation of the biological removal process of organic matter and nutrients (Caracterización de las aguas residuales y calibración del modelo matemático BNRM1 para la simulación de los procesos de eliminación biológica de materia orgánica y nutrientes). Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Hydraulic Engineering and Environment, Universitat de València, Spain; 2009.Ruano, M. V., Serralta, J., Ribes, J., Garcia-Usach, F., Bouzas, A., Barat, R., … Ferrer, J. (2012). Application of the general model ‘Biological Nutrient Removal Model No. 1’ to upgrade two full-scale WWTPs. Environmental Technology, 33(9), 1005-1012. doi:10.1080/09593330.2011.604877Ferrer, J., Pretel, R., Durán, F., Giménez, J. B., Robles, A., Ruano, M. V., … Seco, A. (2015). Design methodology for submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR): A case study. Separation and Purification Technology, 141, 378-386. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.018AEMET. State Meteorological Agency (Agencia Estatal de Meteorología). Register of hourly and daily average ambient temperature from 2010 to 2014 located in Valencia; 2015