The federal government, pursuant to authorizing statutes, sought to condemn defendant\u27s land, alleging that it was needed as a source of fill for a section of the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways. Defendant offered proof demonstrating that commercial fill could easily be purchased within the immediate area, that it was therefore not necessary for the government to condemn any land in order to complete the construction of the highway, and that his land was zoned light industrial and was thus ideally suited for future development. Employing the usual stringent proof requirements, the court granted the government\u27s motion for summary judgment, on the ground that purely economic considerations will justify the exercise...
In a series of cases the Supreme Court has recognized broad, preemptive federal regulatory power ove...
The bill would have limited the state\u27s ability to take private property under the eminent domain...
In 2021 the United States Supreme Court decided in the case PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey that...
The federal government, pursuant to authorizing statutes, sought to condemn defendant\u27s land, all...
Federal and state governments, through the use of eminent domain, may condemn the property of a priv...
Defendants, landowners and next of kin of persons buried in a cemetery which was being subjected to ...
Prior to 1875, the standard federal takings procedure had been for state governments to condemn prop...
The Supreme Court reaffirms its decision in United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U.S. 222 (1956...
The development of our modern and complex society has necessitated a widespread appropriation of pr...
A federal grant of public land to the city of San Francisco, on condition that the land be used for ...
Under the District of Columbia Redevelopment Act, an agency was created to redevelop blighted and sl...
Changes procedures for condemning property if property will not be owned and permanently used by the...
Implementation of the federal plan for an interstate system of controlled access highways has greatl...
Evidence of Revenue Produced from Property Taken by Eminent Domain Held Relevant to Determining Mark...
Defendant city instituted a comprehensive urban redevelopment plan under which condemnation and purc...
In a series of cases the Supreme Court has recognized broad, preemptive federal regulatory power ove...
The bill would have limited the state\u27s ability to take private property under the eminent domain...
In 2021 the United States Supreme Court decided in the case PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey that...
The federal government, pursuant to authorizing statutes, sought to condemn defendant\u27s land, all...
Federal and state governments, through the use of eminent domain, may condemn the property of a priv...
Defendants, landowners and next of kin of persons buried in a cemetery which was being subjected to ...
Prior to 1875, the standard federal takings procedure had been for state governments to condemn prop...
The Supreme Court reaffirms its decision in United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U.S. 222 (1956...
The development of our modern and complex society has necessitated a widespread appropriation of pr...
A federal grant of public land to the city of San Francisco, on condition that the land be used for ...
Under the District of Columbia Redevelopment Act, an agency was created to redevelop blighted and sl...
Changes procedures for condemning property if property will not be owned and permanently used by the...
Implementation of the federal plan for an interstate system of controlled access highways has greatl...
Evidence of Revenue Produced from Property Taken by Eminent Domain Held Relevant to Determining Mark...
Defendant city instituted a comprehensive urban redevelopment plan under which condemnation and purc...
In a series of cases the Supreme Court has recognized broad, preemptive federal regulatory power ove...
The bill would have limited the state\u27s ability to take private property under the eminent domain...
In 2021 the United States Supreme Court decided in the case PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey that...