Successful statistical reasoning emerges from a dynamic system including: a cognitive agent, material artifacts with their actions possibilities, and the thoughts and actions that are realized while reasoning takes place. Five experiments provide evidence that enabling the physical manipulation of the problem information (through the use of playing cards) substantially improves statistical reasoning, without training or instruction, not only with natural frequency statements (Experiment 1) but also with single-event probability statements (Experiment 2). Improved statistical reasoning was not simply a matter of making all sets and subsets explicit in the pack of cards (Experiment 3), it was not merely due to the discrete and countable layou...
How do people reason about their opponent in turn-taking games? Often, people do not make the decisi...
Proper Bayesian reasoning is critical across a broad swath of domains that require practitioners to ...
Are humans intuitive Bayesians? It depends. People seem to be Bayesians when updating probabilities ...
People often struggle when making Bayesian probabilistic estimates on the basis of competing sources...
Performance on probabilistic reasoning tasks varies widely, yet people can take advantage of data at...
We confess that the first part of our title is somewhat of a misnomer. Bayesian reasoning is a norma...
People possess an abstract inferential rule system that is an intuitive version of the law of large ...
Citation: Brase, G. L., & Hill, W. T. (2015). Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a...
Can children reason the Bayesian way? We argue that the answer to this question depends on how numbe...
Is the mind, by design, predisposed against performing Bayesian inference? Previous research on base...
Bayesian reasoning, defined here as the updating of a posterior probability following new informatio...
Judgements in the real-world often inherently involve uncertainty, from the mundane: "do those cloud...
This paper investigates the ability of individuals to make complex chains of reasoning, similar to t...
Reasoning and inference are well-studied aspects of basic cognition that have been explained as stat...
Inferring on others' (potentially time-varying) intentions is a fundamental problem during many soci...
How do people reason about their opponent in turn-taking games? Often, people do not make the decisi...
Proper Bayesian reasoning is critical across a broad swath of domains that require practitioners to ...
Are humans intuitive Bayesians? It depends. People seem to be Bayesians when updating probabilities ...
People often struggle when making Bayesian probabilistic estimates on the basis of competing sources...
Performance on probabilistic reasoning tasks varies widely, yet people can take advantage of data at...
We confess that the first part of our title is somewhat of a misnomer. Bayesian reasoning is a norma...
People possess an abstract inferential rule system that is an intuitive version of the law of large ...
Citation: Brase, G. L., & Hill, W. T. (2015). Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a...
Can children reason the Bayesian way? We argue that the answer to this question depends on how numbe...
Is the mind, by design, predisposed against performing Bayesian inference? Previous research on base...
Bayesian reasoning, defined here as the updating of a posterior probability following new informatio...
Judgements in the real-world often inherently involve uncertainty, from the mundane: "do those cloud...
This paper investigates the ability of individuals to make complex chains of reasoning, similar to t...
Reasoning and inference are well-studied aspects of basic cognition that have been explained as stat...
Inferring on others' (potentially time-varying) intentions is a fundamental problem during many soci...
How do people reason about their opponent in turn-taking games? Often, people do not make the decisi...
Proper Bayesian reasoning is critical across a broad swath of domains that require practitioners to ...
Are humans intuitive Bayesians? It depends. People seem to be Bayesians when updating probabilities ...