Abstract Background Several reviews have noted shortcomings regarding the quality and reporting of network meta-analyses (NMAs). We suspect that this issue may be partially attributable to limitations in current NMA software which do not readily produce all of the output needed to satisfy current guidelines. Results To better facilitate the conduct and reporting of NMAs, we have created an R package called “BUGSnet” (Bayesian inference Using Gibbs Sampling to conduct a Network meta-analysis). This R package relies upon Just Another Gibbs Sampler (JAGS) to conduct Bayesian NMA using a generalized linear model. BUGSnet contains a suite...
Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a statistical technique for the comparison of treatment options. The ...
Network meta-analysis is a popular way to combine results from several studies (usually randomized t...
Outcome reporting bias (ORB) occurs in a large percentage of medical studies, and it is a particular...
Abstract Background Several reviews have noted shortc...
Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) is an analysis of synthesizing information from multiple independent sou...
This study presents an overview of conceptual and practical issues of a network meta-analysis (NMA),...
Network meta-analysis (NMA)--a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments i...
Network meta-analysis has been introduced as an extension of pairwise meta-analysis to facilitate in...
Background: A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) model is a statistical method aimed at estimating...
Meta-analysis is a valuable tool for combining evidence from multiple studies. Network meta-analysis...
BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis is a valuable tool for combining evidence from multiple studies. Network m...
Meta-analysis can only compare studies with the same interventions, while a network meta-analysis ca...
In this manuscript we use realistic data to conduct a network meta-analysis using a Bayesian approac...
In network meta-analysis (NMA), we synthesize all relevant evidence about health outcomes with compe...
Network meta-analysis (NMA), also known as multiple treatment comparisons, is commonly used to incor...
Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a statistical technique for the comparison of treatment options. The ...
Network meta-analysis is a popular way to combine results from several studies (usually randomized t...
Outcome reporting bias (ORB) occurs in a large percentage of medical studies, and it is a particular...
Abstract Background Several reviews have noted shortc...
Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) is an analysis of synthesizing information from multiple independent sou...
This study presents an overview of conceptual and practical issues of a network meta-analysis (NMA),...
Network meta-analysis (NMA)--a statistical technique that allows comparison of multiple treatments i...
Network meta-analysis has been introduced as an extension of pairwise meta-analysis to facilitate in...
Background: A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) model is a statistical method aimed at estimating...
Meta-analysis is a valuable tool for combining evidence from multiple studies. Network meta-analysis...
BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis is a valuable tool for combining evidence from multiple studies. Network m...
Meta-analysis can only compare studies with the same interventions, while a network meta-analysis ca...
In this manuscript we use realistic data to conduct a network meta-analysis using a Bayesian approac...
In network meta-analysis (NMA), we synthesize all relevant evidence about health outcomes with compe...
Network meta-analysis (NMA), also known as multiple treatment comparisons, is commonly used to incor...
Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a statistical technique for the comparison of treatment options. The ...
Network meta-analysis is a popular way to combine results from several studies (usually randomized t...
Outcome reporting bias (ORB) occurs in a large percentage of medical studies, and it is a particular...