As the title indicates, this thesis is concerned with the strength of non-uniformity in proof complexity. The non-uniform part is there because we look at quantified propositional proof systems. With these proof systems we are interested in the minimum size of proofs that prove a family of tautologies. Like circuits, these proofs are not necessarily easy to construct. We measure the strength of a proof system by characterizing which families of tautologies have polynomial-size proofs in the proof system. The proof systems we examine were first introduced by Kraj\'{\i}cek and Pudl{\'a}k \cite{KP90}, but have only received limited attention since then. These systems are called $G_i$ and $G_i^*$. $G_i$ is the propositional version ...
We define a map g: {0, 1} n → {0, 1} n+1 such that all output bits are defined by 2DNF formulas in t...
AbstractIn this paper we prove some results about the complexity of proofs. We consider proofs in Hi...
We prove lower bounds of the form exp (n " d ) ; " d ? 0; on the length of proofs of an ...
As the title indicates, this thesis is concerned with the strength of non-uniformity in proof comple...
This thesis is dedicated to the study of the relations between uniform and nonuniform proof complexi...
This thesis is dedicated to the study of the relations between uniform and nonuniform proof complexi...
Proof complexity focuses on the complexity of theorem proving procedures, a topic which is tightly l...
We present and study a framework in which one can present alternation-based lower bounds on proof le...
We present and study a framework in which one can present alternation-based lower bounds on proof le...
We present and study a framework in which one can present alternation-based lower bounds on proof le...
We formalize and study the question of whether there are inherent difficulties to showing lower boun...
We formalize and study the question of whether there are inherent difficulties to showing lower boun...
We formalize and study the question of whether there are inherent difficulties to showing lower boun...
We define the notion of the uniform reduct of a propositional proof system as the set of those bound...
We define the notion of the uniform reduct of a propositional proof system as the set of those bound...
We define a map g: {0, 1} n → {0, 1} n+1 such that all output bits are defined by 2DNF formulas in t...
AbstractIn this paper we prove some results about the complexity of proofs. We consider proofs in Hi...
We prove lower bounds of the form exp (n " d ) ; " d ? 0; on the length of proofs of an ...
As the title indicates, this thesis is concerned with the strength of non-uniformity in proof comple...
This thesis is dedicated to the study of the relations between uniform and nonuniform proof complexi...
This thesis is dedicated to the study of the relations between uniform and nonuniform proof complexi...
Proof complexity focuses on the complexity of theorem proving procedures, a topic which is tightly l...
We present and study a framework in which one can present alternation-based lower bounds on proof le...
We present and study a framework in which one can present alternation-based lower bounds on proof le...
We present and study a framework in which one can present alternation-based lower bounds on proof le...
We formalize and study the question of whether there are inherent difficulties to showing lower boun...
We formalize and study the question of whether there are inherent difficulties to showing lower boun...
We formalize and study the question of whether there are inherent difficulties to showing lower boun...
We define the notion of the uniform reduct of a propositional proof system as the set of those bound...
We define the notion of the uniform reduct of a propositional proof system as the set of those bound...
We define a map g: {0, 1} n → {0, 1} n+1 such that all output bits are defined by 2DNF formulas in t...
AbstractIn this paper we prove some results about the complexity of proofs. We consider proofs in Hi...
We prove lower bounds of the form exp (n " d ) ; " d ? 0; on the length of proofs of an ...