100 trap points spaced 7.6 m apart in a 10 X 10 pattern. This grid was live-trapped from July 4-6, 1978 to May 19-21, 1982. Initially it was trapped every two weeks throughout the year but near the end of the study, only in the snow free periods. The main trap used was the Longworth live trap. From the summer of 1979 onwards it was also trapped with pitfall traps (May-November). The following publications have reported various aspects of this data. The primary one which describes the site and its vegetation and gives an aerial shot of the area is Boonstra and Rodd (1983)
The study compared effects of four distances between traps (range 0.5-4.0 m) on arthropod captures. ...
This dataset contains information on long-term small mammal trapping on the Virginia Coast Reserve L...
<p>Trial was conducted in Madison, Wisconsin (latitude 43.096629, longitude -89.331993) on July 24–2...
100 trap points spaced 7.6 m apart in a 10 X 10 pattern. This grid was live-trapped from July 4-6, ...
A field population of Microtus townsendii was trapped concurrently with live-traps and pitfall traps...
Mark -recapture methods produce more accurate estimates when a high fraction of the population is tr...
Two populations of Microtus pennsylvanicus were trapped simultaneously with longworth live traps and...
Microtus pennsylvanicus was livetrapped on demographic grids in Ontario and Manitoba to detennine th...
Small mammals were live trapped during the summer of each year at various locations on Niwot Ridge. ...
This data was collected by Ray Dueser, Bob Rose and their students (among them, Marcia Wilson, John ...
documented accurately since 1960. Most records are based on nest findings and there have been few di...
Methods and locations. Pitfall trap grids were installed at three creosotebush sites, three grasslan...
� May 2001 - March 2007. Four field vole populations trapped every 28 days (March-November) or every...
Fates of disappearing individuals were determined for two natural populations of Microtus townsendi ...
The population dynamics of Microtus townsendii in a linear habitat were monitored weekly for one yea...
The study compared effects of four distances between traps (range 0.5-4.0 m) on arthropod captures. ...
This dataset contains information on long-term small mammal trapping on the Virginia Coast Reserve L...
<p>Trial was conducted in Madison, Wisconsin (latitude 43.096629, longitude -89.331993) on July 24–2...
100 trap points spaced 7.6 m apart in a 10 X 10 pattern. This grid was live-trapped from July 4-6, ...
A field population of Microtus townsendii was trapped concurrently with live-traps and pitfall traps...
Mark -recapture methods produce more accurate estimates when a high fraction of the population is tr...
Two populations of Microtus pennsylvanicus were trapped simultaneously with longworth live traps and...
Microtus pennsylvanicus was livetrapped on demographic grids in Ontario and Manitoba to detennine th...
Small mammals were live trapped during the summer of each year at various locations on Niwot Ridge. ...
This data was collected by Ray Dueser, Bob Rose and their students (among them, Marcia Wilson, John ...
documented accurately since 1960. Most records are based on nest findings and there have been few di...
Methods and locations. Pitfall trap grids were installed at three creosotebush sites, three grasslan...
� May 2001 - March 2007. Four field vole populations trapped every 28 days (March-November) or every...
Fates of disappearing individuals were determined for two natural populations of Microtus townsendi ...
The population dynamics of Microtus townsendii in a linear habitat were monitored weekly for one yea...
The study compared effects of four distances between traps (range 0.5-4.0 m) on arthropod captures. ...
This dataset contains information on long-term small mammal trapping on the Virginia Coast Reserve L...
<p>Trial was conducted in Madison, Wisconsin (latitude 43.096629, longitude -89.331993) on July 24–2...