In Table III on page C455, the units of the parameter k1 was incorrectly given as s−1. The correct unit is cm s−1. Additionally, in Fig. 8c on page C457, the value of Cv 0, or Cv f/s [with superscript “0” indicating the film/solution (“f/s”) interface], are incorrect; the correct value being 0.61810−2 mol cm−3.</p
The Comments by Martino et al.1 on the original manuscript2 criticize our interpretation of the exis...
Correction for ‘High performing AgNW transparent conducting electrodes with a sheet resistance of 2....
The authors regret errors in the above mentioned article in the equation (2)as well as in the Fig. 1...
In Table III on page C455, the units of the parameter k1 was incorrectly given as s−1. The correct u...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
Nature Communications 7: Article number: 13066 (2016); Published: 7 October 2016; Updated: 15 Decemb...
Equation 20, on page E823, should not include the final × 100. The corrected equation is shown below...
The unit of the average transmembrane flux ([Formula presented]) in the legends of the graphs shown ...
Response to Comments on E. Huttunen-Saarivirta et al., "Kinetic Properties of the Passive Film on Co...
Authors would like to thank the financial support of Italian Ministry of University and Research (MI...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
In the original version of the manuscript, the fit function presented in the caption of Fig. 7 for t...
1. Equation 4 in the text and in Table I has two wrong minus signs in the publication. It should rea...
Correction for 'Resurgence of DSCs with copper electrolyte: a detailed investigation of interfacial ...
Nature Communications 1:55 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1052 (2010); Published 10 Aug 2010; Updated 19 Sep 201...
The Comments by Martino et al.1 on the original manuscript2 criticize our interpretation of the exis...
Correction for ‘High performing AgNW transparent conducting electrodes with a sheet resistance of 2....
The authors regret errors in the above mentioned article in the equation (2)as well as in the Fig. 1...
In Table III on page C455, the units of the parameter k1 was incorrectly given as s−1. The correct u...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
Nature Communications 7: Article number: 13066 (2016); Published: 7 October 2016; Updated: 15 Decemb...
Equation 20, on page E823, should not include the final × 100. The corrected equation is shown below...
The unit of the average transmembrane flux ([Formula presented]) in the legends of the graphs shown ...
Response to Comments on E. Huttunen-Saarivirta et al., "Kinetic Properties of the Passive Film on Co...
Authors would like to thank the financial support of Italian Ministry of University and Research (MI...
Page 8372 in section 2.3. ORR Kinetics. There is an error in the sentence "The effective surface of ...
In the original version of the manuscript, the fit function presented in the caption of Fig. 7 for t...
1. Equation 4 in the text and in Table I has two wrong minus signs in the publication. It should rea...
Correction for 'Resurgence of DSCs with copper electrolyte: a detailed investigation of interfacial ...
Nature Communications 1:55 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1052 (2010); Published 10 Aug 2010; Updated 19 Sep 201...
The Comments by Martino et al.1 on the original manuscript2 criticize our interpretation of the exis...
Correction for ‘High performing AgNW transparent conducting electrodes with a sheet resistance of 2....
The authors regret errors in the above mentioned article in the equation (2)as well as in the Fig. 1...