171 p.Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1984.This dissertation argues that the unsatisfactory state of affairs in contemporary program evaluation evidenced by repeated findings of no significant difference is not primarily the result of technical inadequacy, but that it derives from theoretical, especially epistemological, problems. It is claimed that quantitative-experimental as well as qualitative evaluation holds inaccurate foundationalist views of knowledge which practically serve the interests of relatively narrow but powerful groups such as evaluators and sponsors. Foundationalist views of knowledge are those which claim epistemic privilege subject to the allegedly secure foundations of "sense data,"...
International audienceThe intellectual origins of programme evaluation. Programme evaluation is not ...
Over the relatively short history of professional evaluation, those working in the field have direct...
Exploring the influence and application of Campbellian validity typology in the theory and practice ...
This thesis examines the aims and methods of evaluation research, and, ultimately, considers what fu...
Evaluation research involves the use of social research methodologies to judge and improve the plann...
Recent growth and co-optation of social reform programs into the structure of the State, and paralle...
Discusses the use of social experiments to develop the case for or against a position
An eminent policy analyst has suggested tha t all scientific knowledge be categorized into three lev...
Evolutionary theory, developmental systems theory, and evolutionary epistemology provide deep theore...
Presents a compilation of Campbell\u27s writings on research methodologies in social science
In the past decade, important struggles about the production of knowledge have taken place in histor...
n Donald Campbell's now famous article 'Reforms as Experiments', he wrote that modern...
Current idealized evaluation practices are often modeled on a probative, criteria and standards-base...
is paper explores the issue of epistemic injustice in research evaluation.rough an analysis of the d...
More than merely describing what constitutes a good or truthful interpretation, all judg-ments about...
International audienceThe intellectual origins of programme evaluation. Programme evaluation is not ...
Over the relatively short history of professional evaluation, those working in the field have direct...
Exploring the influence and application of Campbellian validity typology in the theory and practice ...
This thesis examines the aims and methods of evaluation research, and, ultimately, considers what fu...
Evaluation research involves the use of social research methodologies to judge and improve the plann...
Recent growth and co-optation of social reform programs into the structure of the State, and paralle...
Discusses the use of social experiments to develop the case for or against a position
An eminent policy analyst has suggested tha t all scientific knowledge be categorized into three lev...
Evolutionary theory, developmental systems theory, and evolutionary epistemology provide deep theore...
Presents a compilation of Campbell\u27s writings on research methodologies in social science
In the past decade, important struggles about the production of knowledge have taken place in histor...
n Donald Campbell's now famous article 'Reforms as Experiments', he wrote that modern...
Current idealized evaluation practices are often modeled on a probative, criteria and standards-base...
is paper explores the issue of epistemic injustice in research evaluation.rough an analysis of the d...
More than merely describing what constitutes a good or truthful interpretation, all judg-ments about...
International audienceThe intellectual origins of programme evaluation. Programme evaluation is not ...
Over the relatively short history of professional evaluation, those working in the field have direct...
Exploring the influence and application of Campbellian validity typology in the theory and practice ...