Low cycle fatigue behavior of a multiphase microalloyed medium carbon steel: comparison between ferrite–pearlite and quenched and tempered microstructures

In an attempt to improve fatigue and fracture resistance, a multiphase (ferrite–bainite–martensite) microstructure was developed in a V-bearing medium carbon microalloyed steel using a two-step cooling and annealing (TSCA) treatment following finish forging. The monotonic, cyclic stress–strain and low cycle fatigue behavior of this steel are reported. These results are compared with those of ferrite–pearlite and tempered martensite microstructures obtained by air cooling (AC) and quenching and tempering (Q&T), respectively. The tensile properties of the multiphase microstructure are superior to those of the ferrite–pearlite and the Q&T microstructures. Under cyclic loading, the ferrite–pearlite microstructure showed hardening at higher total strain amplitudes (≥0.7%) and softening at lower total strain amplitudes (<0.7%). The quenched and tempered and the ferrite–bainite–martensite (TSCA) microstructures displayed cyclic softening at all total strain amplitudes employed. Despite the cyclic softening, the ferrite–bainite–martensite structure was cyclically stronger than the ferrite–pearlite and the Q&T microstructures. Bilinearity in the Coffin–Manson plots was observed in Q&T and the multiphase TSCA conditions. An analysis of fracture surface provided evidence for predominantly ductile crack growth (microvoid coalescence and growth) in the ferrite–pearlite microstructure and mixed mode (ductile and brittle) crack growth in Q&T and the multiphase TSCA microstructures