Illegal evidence

Problemi nezakonitih dokaza u kaznenoj grani prava se svakodnevno sve više pojavljuju u praksi pred domaćim i stranim sudovima, a posebice pred Europskim sudom za ljudska prava (ESLJP). Iako su za ocjenu zakonitosti dokaza nadležni domaći sudovi, ESLJP ipak može kroz određene mehanizme odrediti je li postupak prikupljanja spornih dokaza utjecao na pravičnost cijelog postupka pred domaćim sudom. Posebno se ističe pitanje ispravnosti tehničkih snimki kao dokaza, prikupljenih bez sudskog naloga, odnosno bez dozvole i znanja osobe koja se snima. Opširna domaća sudska praksa i praksa ESLJP-a pokazuje da su rješenja različita, što dovodi mnoge stručnjake u kaznenoj grani prava u detaljne analize, a to rezultira brojnim radovima koji se temelje na toj specifičnoj vrsti dokaza.The problems of illegal evidence in the criminal branch of law are increasing in practice on a daily basis in front of domestic and foreign courts, and in particular in front of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Although the domestic courts have jurisdiction over the legality of the evidence, the ECHR can nevertheless determine, through certain mechanisms, whether the procedure of collecting disputed evidence has affected the fairness of the entire proceedings in front of domestic court. Particular emphasis is placed on the correctness of the tehnical recordings as evidence, obtained without court order or without the permission and knowledge of the person being recorded. Extensive domestic case law and ECHR practice show that the solutions are different, which brings many criminal law professionals into detailed analyzes, resulting in a number of papers based in this specific type of evidence