In this essay I examine how broadly precedents constrain (their scope) and how strongly they do so (their strength). With respect to scope, I look at three models of precedent and conclude that only one of these is both constraining and coherent. With respect to strength, I affiliate overruling precedents with the more general issue of legal transitions and conclude that no algorithm for when to overrule is available. Overruling precedents turns out to be only an instance of the more general problem of the rationality of rule following
Despite the encroachment of legislation on matters that used to lie within the province of the commo...
The decision to overrule precedent, we argue, results from the justices’ pursuit of their policy pre...
The standard model of vertical precedent is part of the deep structure of our legal system. Under th...
Abstract This paper describes one way in which a precise reason model of precedent could be develope...
The scope of Supreme Court precedent is capacious. Justices of the Court commonly defer to sweeping ...
Why and when should courts presumptively defer to their own past precedents? The doctrine of precede...
According to the prioritized reason model of precedent, precedential constraint is explained in term...
Horty, Rigoni and Prakken have developed formal characterisations of precedential constraint based o...
In this paper several existing dimension-based models of precedential constraint are compared and an...
In this paper several recent factor- and dimension-based models of precedential constraint are forma...
The Supreme Court follows the Doctrine of Stare Decisis, of which dictates that the Court must follo...
We investigate the evolution of common law under overruling, a system of precedent change in which a...
In recent work, theories of case-based legal reasoning have been applied to the development of expla...
We investigate the evolution of common law under overruling, a system of precedent change in which a...
Current theories of precedential constraint attempt to incorporate dimensions into the reasons for d...
Despite the encroachment of legislation on matters that used to lie within the province of the commo...
The decision to overrule precedent, we argue, results from the justices’ pursuit of their policy pre...
The standard model of vertical precedent is part of the deep structure of our legal system. Under th...
Abstract This paper describes one way in which a precise reason model of precedent could be develope...
The scope of Supreme Court precedent is capacious. Justices of the Court commonly defer to sweeping ...
Why and when should courts presumptively defer to their own past precedents? The doctrine of precede...
According to the prioritized reason model of precedent, precedential constraint is explained in term...
Horty, Rigoni and Prakken have developed formal characterisations of precedential constraint based o...
In this paper several existing dimension-based models of precedential constraint are compared and an...
In this paper several recent factor- and dimension-based models of precedential constraint are forma...
The Supreme Court follows the Doctrine of Stare Decisis, of which dictates that the Court must follo...
We investigate the evolution of common law under overruling, a system of precedent change in which a...
In recent work, theories of case-based legal reasoning have been applied to the development of expla...
We investigate the evolution of common law under overruling, a system of precedent change in which a...
Current theories of precedential constraint attempt to incorporate dimensions into the reasons for d...
Despite the encroachment of legislation on matters that used to lie within the province of the commo...
The decision to overrule precedent, we argue, results from the justices’ pursuit of their policy pre...
The standard model of vertical precedent is part of the deep structure of our legal system. Under th...