Add to ORKGProfessor Michael Moore\u27s contribution to this symposium represents a deep and thorough examination of the relationship between counterfactual and causal tests, the meeting of which are often taken to be necessary conditions for various sorts of moral and legal responsibility
Whether there exist causal relations between guns firing and people dying, between pedals pressed an...
This paper deals with the relationship between legal responsibility and causation. I argue that lega...
This paper argues that a counterpart-theoretic treatment of events, combined with a counterfactual t...
Unlike any other monograph on legal liability, Michael S. Moore’s book CAUSATION AND RESPONSIBILITY ...
This article is part of a symposium on Michael Moore\u27s Causation and Responsibility. In Causation...
On February 28-March 1, 2003, the University of San Diego Institute for Law and Philosophy held a co...
Causation is commonly defined using the counterfactual model, and the “but-for” standard in particul...
Michael Moore’s sweeping, insightful and startlingly learned book, Causation and Responsibility, con...
Michael Moore believes that causation of harm is central to criminal desert, and he believes that wh...
This article focuses on David Lewis’s theory of causation. The author provides helpful clarity regar...
This Article considers some of the uses of counterfactuals in the law. Counterfactuals are a type of...
Since the function of causation is to recount and explain observed phenomena in order to make a judg...
We provide an introduction to some of the key issues raised in this volume by considering how indiv...
The standard view in philosophy is that responsibility entails causation. Most philosophers treat th...
Whether there exist causal relations between guns firing and people dying, between pedals pressed an...
This paper deals with the relationship between legal responsibility and causation. I argue that lega...
This paper argues that a counterpart-theoretic treatment of events, combined with a counterfactual t...
Unlike any other monograph on legal liability, Michael S. Moore’s book CAUSATION AND RESPONSIBILITY ...
This article is part of a symposium on Michael Moore\u27s Causation and Responsibility. In Causation...
On February 28-March 1, 2003, the University of San Diego Institute for Law and Philosophy held a co...
Causation is commonly defined using the counterfactual model, and the “but-for” standard in particul...
Michael Moore’s sweeping, insightful and startlingly learned book, Causation and Responsibility, con...
Michael Moore believes that causation of harm is central to criminal desert, and he believes that wh...
This article focuses on David Lewis’s theory of causation. The author provides helpful clarity regar...
This Article considers some of the uses of counterfactuals in the law. Counterfactuals are a type of...
Since the function of causation is to recount and explain observed phenomena in order to make a judg...
We provide an introduction to some of the key issues raised in this volume by considering how indiv...
The standard view in philosophy is that responsibility entails causation. Most philosophers treat th...
Whether there exist causal relations between guns firing and people dying, between pedals pressed an...
This paper deals with the relationship between legal responsibility and causation. I argue that lega...
This paper argues that a counterpart-theoretic treatment of events, combined with a counterfactual t...