The territorial limitations of sovereignty have been held to preclude a country from giving extraterritorial effect to its patent laws, and, therefore, a patent confers rights which are protected only within the boundaries of the issuing country. Thus, United States and foreign patents, even when granted for the same invention, create separate and distinct rights which may differ in scope and effect in the respective countries. Concomitantly, courts have also held that a foreign patent confers upon its owner no rights or protection with respect to acts done in the United States
When in Equustek v. Google a Canadian court ordered that Google de-list the pages of a defendant tha...
Professor Marketa Trimble presented these materials at the University of Macerata on November 6, 201...
By statute, all cases “arising under” patent law must be heard exclusively by the federal courts (no...
Patents are generally considered to be the most territorial of all the various forms of intellectual...
One of the greatest challenges facing patent holders is the enforcement of their rights against fore...
This Note examines current approaches to the question of personal jurisdiction over alien patent inf...
When a foreign state infringes a US-held intellectual property right abroad, it is unclear to what e...
The massive rise in the amount of inventions within the field of information technology has caused p...
One of the greatest challenges facing patent holders is the enforcement of their rights against fore...
The exclusive rights of a U.S. patent are limited in two important ways. First, a patent has a techn...
A proper jurisdictional balance between state and federal court systems has long been a goal of fede...
This paper presents results from a multiple-year project concerned with the involvement of foreign (...
27-32Intellectual property right is a critical part of international trade. In the process of inte...
With the ever-increasing international flavor of business comes an important question for United Sta...
One of the most controversial issues in American law today is the extent to which it is appropriate ...
When in Equustek v. Google a Canadian court ordered that Google de-list the pages of a defendant tha...
Professor Marketa Trimble presented these materials at the University of Macerata on November 6, 201...
By statute, all cases “arising under” patent law must be heard exclusively by the federal courts (no...
Patents are generally considered to be the most territorial of all the various forms of intellectual...
One of the greatest challenges facing patent holders is the enforcement of their rights against fore...
This Note examines current approaches to the question of personal jurisdiction over alien patent inf...
When a foreign state infringes a US-held intellectual property right abroad, it is unclear to what e...
The massive rise in the amount of inventions within the field of information technology has caused p...
One of the greatest challenges facing patent holders is the enforcement of their rights against fore...
The exclusive rights of a U.S. patent are limited in two important ways. First, a patent has a techn...
A proper jurisdictional balance between state and federal court systems has long been a goal of fede...
This paper presents results from a multiple-year project concerned with the involvement of foreign (...
27-32Intellectual property right is a critical part of international trade. In the process of inte...
With the ever-increasing international flavor of business comes an important question for United Sta...
One of the most controversial issues in American law today is the extent to which it is appropriate ...
When in Equustek v. Google a Canadian court ordered that Google de-list the pages of a defendant tha...
Professor Marketa Trimble presented these materials at the University of Macerata on November 6, 201...
By statute, all cases “arising under” patent law must be heard exclusively by the federal courts (no...