The reproducibility crisis in published scientific work is changing the way that research is designed and conducted. Librarians in academic institutions can play a key role in promoting improved adherence to evidence-based guidelines for performing literature reviews. The Cornell Systematic Review Team has developed a checklist, https://osf.io/2edg9/?pid=ezqpd, that can be used in research consultations as a conversation framework when assisting patrons with review design. This checklist is informed by widely accepted best practices for development of a sound systematic review protocol. Discussing this checklist with patrons promotes increased transparency, reduction of bias, and improved reproducibility of graduate student and faculty rese...
Traditional approaches to reviewing literature may be susceptible to bias and result in incorrect de...
A recent addition to our capstone project options in the Bachelor of Computer and Information Scienc...
An overview of the process of implementing a formal systematic review service for academic health sc...
A book chapter from the Association of College and Research Libraries publication titled Reflections...
Review articles can provide valuable summaries of the ever-increasing volume of primary research in ...
Objective: Research has shown that the quality and reproducibility of systematic reviews increases w...
This commentary presents a rationale for undertaking systematic reviews in library and information p...
Systematic reviews are well established in evidence-based medicine, where experimental results are u...
Medical and health sciences librarians have been participating in supporting their communities of re...
Since their inception in the health sciences field, systematic reviews have expanded into many other...
The author presents a case study for the development of an evidence synthesis service serving resear...
This session will discuss the basics of conducting a systematic review and how they are different fr...
Many health professionals, students and academics including health researchers will have grappled wi...
This textbook guides the reader on how to undertake high-quality literature reviews, from traditiona...
Problem: The scientific method is unrivalled as a basis for generating useful knowledge, yet researc...
Traditional approaches to reviewing literature may be susceptible to bias and result in incorrect de...
A recent addition to our capstone project options in the Bachelor of Computer and Information Scienc...
An overview of the process of implementing a formal systematic review service for academic health sc...
A book chapter from the Association of College and Research Libraries publication titled Reflections...
Review articles can provide valuable summaries of the ever-increasing volume of primary research in ...
Objective: Research has shown that the quality and reproducibility of systematic reviews increases w...
This commentary presents a rationale for undertaking systematic reviews in library and information p...
Systematic reviews are well established in evidence-based medicine, where experimental results are u...
Medical and health sciences librarians have been participating in supporting their communities of re...
Since their inception in the health sciences field, systematic reviews have expanded into many other...
The author presents a case study for the development of an evidence synthesis service serving resear...
This session will discuss the basics of conducting a systematic review and how they are different fr...
Many health professionals, students and academics including health researchers will have grappled wi...
This textbook guides the reader on how to undertake high-quality literature reviews, from traditiona...
Problem: The scientific method is unrivalled as a basis for generating useful knowledge, yet researc...
Traditional approaches to reviewing literature may be susceptible to bias and result in incorrect de...
A recent addition to our capstone project options in the Bachelor of Computer and Information Scienc...
An overview of the process of implementing a formal systematic review service for academic health sc...