This paper formally compares some central notions from two well-known formalisms for rule-based argumentation, DeLP and ASPIC+. The comparisons especially focus on intuitive adequacy and inter-translatability, consistency, and closure properties. As for differences in the definitions of arguments and attack, it turns out that DeLP's definitions are intuitively appealing but that they may not fully comply with Caminada and Amgoud's rationality postulates of strict closure and indirect consistency. For some special cases, the DeLP definitions are shown to fare better than ASPIC+. Next, it is argued that there are reasons to consider a variant of DeLP with grounded semantics, since in some examples its current notion of warrant arguably has co...
In this technical report, we present an application of the structured argumentation methodology to a...
Two important notions within the field of classical argumentation are undercutting defeaters and bac...
The adoption of a generic contrariness notion in ASPIC+ substantially enhances its expressiveness wi...
This paper formally compares some central notions from two well-known formalisms for rule-based argu...
This article reviews abstract rule-based approaches to argumentation, in particular the ASPIC+ frame...
This article gives a tutorial introduction to the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation. The...
The ASPIC+ framework is intermediate in abstrac-tion between Dung’s argumentation framework and conc...
Argumentation theory is concerned with the way that intelligent agents discuss whether some statemen...
This paper studies two issues concerning relevance in structured argumentation in the context of the...
This paper studies two issues concerning relevance in structured argumentation in the context of the...
Abstract. This paper analyzes the ASPIC+ argumentation system. It shows that it is grounded on two m...
In this article we offer a formal account of reasoning with legal cases in terms of argumentation sc...
In this article we offer a formal account of reasoning with legal cases in terms of argumentation sc...
This article is devoted to the study of methods to change defeasible logic programs (de.l.p.s) which...
AbstractThis paper builds on the recent ASPIC+ formalism, to develop a general framework for argumen...
In this technical report, we present an application of the structured argumentation methodology to a...
Two important notions within the field of classical argumentation are undercutting defeaters and bac...
The adoption of a generic contrariness notion in ASPIC+ substantially enhances its expressiveness wi...
This paper formally compares some central notions from two well-known formalisms for rule-based argu...
This article reviews abstract rule-based approaches to argumentation, in particular the ASPIC+ frame...
This article gives a tutorial introduction to the ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation. The...
The ASPIC+ framework is intermediate in abstrac-tion between Dung’s argumentation framework and conc...
Argumentation theory is concerned with the way that intelligent agents discuss whether some statemen...
This paper studies two issues concerning relevance in structured argumentation in the context of the...
This paper studies two issues concerning relevance in structured argumentation in the context of the...
Abstract. This paper analyzes the ASPIC+ argumentation system. It shows that it is grounded on two m...
In this article we offer a formal account of reasoning with legal cases in terms of argumentation sc...
In this article we offer a formal account of reasoning with legal cases in terms of argumentation sc...
This article is devoted to the study of methods to change defeasible logic programs (de.l.p.s) which...
AbstractThis paper builds on the recent ASPIC+ formalism, to develop a general framework for argumen...
In this technical report, we present an application of the structured argumentation methodology to a...
Two important notions within the field of classical argumentation are undercutting defeaters and bac...
The adoption of a generic contrariness notion in ASPIC+ substantially enhances its expressiveness wi...