Auditory brain-stem (ABRs) and middle latency responses (MLRs) in the prognosis of severely head-injured patients

Auditory brain-stem responses (ABRs) were studied in 66 subjects with severe head trauma. Middle latency responses (MLRs) were also recorded in 22 of them. Patients were carefully selected to avoid conditions such as pre-existing or acute deafness, hypothermia or ethanol intoxication. In order to evaluate the usefulness of potentials in predicting recovery, patients were classified according to the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). ABR tracings were classified into 5 groups and MLR into 2 groups. The recovery was good in the presence of a type 1 ABR, poor in the presence of types 3, 4 and 5. Concerning type 2 ABR, the outcome is related to the MLR type, and to the presence of an electrophysiological improvement within the first 3 months following trauma. The reliability of ABR and MLR in predicting the outcome of severe head injury appears to be greater than other usually considered clinical and instrumental data (age, GCS, CT scan, EEG)