This paper explores the similarities and differences between promissory estoppel, proprietary estoppel and the remedial constructive trust. Although the three are quite different at one level, as the first is a defence to an action, the second a cause of action as well as a defence, and the third simply a remedy to a cause of action, a closer examination reveals certain underlying similarities. The comparison highlights proprietary estoppel, an oft-overlooked concept in Canada, but which is comparable to promissory estoppel at the substantive level and the constructive trust at the remedial level
In Canada and the United States, the constructive trust is a proprietary remedy awarded mainly to pr...
Promissory estoppel took shape in the nineteenth century to smooth out the rigidity of the doctrine ...
This article analyses the contrasting reasoning and outcomes in two cases concerning proprietary est...
This paper explores the similarities and differences between promissory estoppel, proprietary estopp...
Repeated comments are made as to the similarity between the common intention constructive trust and ...
Case law accurately delineates the four evolutionary stages of promissory estoppel. As an overview, ...
This paper considers how promissory estoppel jobs are undertaken in two jurisdictions that ought not...
The recent decision in RBC Dominion Securities Inc.v. Dawson\u27 raises some interesting questions r...
In England the constructive trust is characterised as institutional, arising by operation of law at ...
The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel is based on the rule of equity and has been developed gradually ...
When studied in its historical dimension, the English doctrine of estoppel does not anymore appear l...
In a series of recent cases, courts have reasserted unconscionability as the basis of proprietary es...
This paper deals with proprietary remedies, in particular the constructive trust, and their applicat...
This article examines the past, present, and future of promissory estoppel. After surveying the deve...
This paper will explore the differences in Canadian common law and Québec civil law in relation to b...
In Canada and the United States, the constructive trust is a proprietary remedy awarded mainly to pr...
Promissory estoppel took shape in the nineteenth century to smooth out the rigidity of the doctrine ...
This article analyses the contrasting reasoning and outcomes in two cases concerning proprietary est...
This paper explores the similarities and differences between promissory estoppel, proprietary estopp...
Repeated comments are made as to the similarity between the common intention constructive trust and ...
Case law accurately delineates the four evolutionary stages of promissory estoppel. As an overview, ...
This paper considers how promissory estoppel jobs are undertaken in two jurisdictions that ought not...
The recent decision in RBC Dominion Securities Inc.v. Dawson\u27 raises some interesting questions r...
In England the constructive trust is characterised as institutional, arising by operation of law at ...
The Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel is based on the rule of equity and has been developed gradually ...
When studied in its historical dimension, the English doctrine of estoppel does not anymore appear l...
In a series of recent cases, courts have reasserted unconscionability as the basis of proprietary es...
This paper deals with proprietary remedies, in particular the constructive trust, and their applicat...
This article examines the past, present, and future of promissory estoppel. After surveying the deve...
This paper will explore the differences in Canadian common law and Québec civil law in relation to b...
In Canada and the United States, the constructive trust is a proprietary remedy awarded mainly to pr...
Promissory estoppel took shape in the nineteenth century to smooth out the rigidity of the doctrine ...
This article analyses the contrasting reasoning and outcomes in two cases concerning proprietary est...