Investors’ treaty-shopping continues to represent a source of unpredictability regarding issues of jurisdiction and/or admissibility before arbitral tribunals. States should consider effectively solving this through apposite treaty provisions. Such clauses would include definitions of corporate investors requiring substantial business activities in the home State, denial-of-benefits and carve-out of dispute-settlement issues from MFN treatment
The provisions of contemporary international investment agreements trace their origins to the U.S. p...
With States increasingly concerned about safeguarding their regulatory powers, it is rather striking...
In recent years, more developed countries have been drawn into investment disputes. As of end 2011, ...
Despite extensive arbitral practice interpreting investment treaty protections, serious shortcomings...
The exclusion of investor-state arbitration from the TTIP agreement would represent a regressive dev...
This study examines the limitations of treaty shopping in international investment law and arbitrati...
This study examines the limitations of treaty shopping in international investment law and arbitrati...
International investment contracts have been viewed as an effective substitute to treaties for their...
This study systematically examines the practice of treaty shopping in international investment law a...
IIAs generally establish obligations for host countries only. Foreign investors may claim for measur...
There is a crisis in international investment law brought about by rapid changes in the economic ord...
Until recently, quantitative assessments of International Investment Agreements (IIAs) have tended t...
The authors identify several ways in which an investment facilitation framework for development can ...
In newer-style investment treaties, states are increasingly protecting and enhancing their role in i...
This article analyzes the magnitude of the treaty shopping practice and draws relevant theoretical a...
The provisions of contemporary international investment agreements trace their origins to the U.S. p...
With States increasingly concerned about safeguarding their regulatory powers, it is rather striking...
In recent years, more developed countries have been drawn into investment disputes. As of end 2011, ...
Despite extensive arbitral practice interpreting investment treaty protections, serious shortcomings...
The exclusion of investor-state arbitration from the TTIP agreement would represent a regressive dev...
This study examines the limitations of treaty shopping in international investment law and arbitrati...
This study examines the limitations of treaty shopping in international investment law and arbitrati...
International investment contracts have been viewed as an effective substitute to treaties for their...
This study systematically examines the practice of treaty shopping in international investment law a...
IIAs generally establish obligations for host countries only. Foreign investors may claim for measur...
There is a crisis in international investment law brought about by rapid changes in the economic ord...
Until recently, quantitative assessments of International Investment Agreements (IIAs) have tended t...
The authors identify several ways in which an investment facilitation framework for development can ...
In newer-style investment treaties, states are increasingly protecting and enhancing their role in i...
This article analyzes the magnitude of the treaty shopping practice and draws relevant theoretical a...
The provisions of contemporary international investment agreements trace their origins to the U.S. p...
With States increasingly concerned about safeguarding their regulatory powers, it is rather striking...
In recent years, more developed countries have been drawn into investment disputes. As of end 2011, ...