Optimizing efficiency and skill utilization: Analysis of genetic counselors’ attitudes regarding delegation in a clinical setting

This study assessed genetic counselors’ (GCs) perceptions of delegation as a tool to increase workforce efficiency and help meet the current gap between the number of genetic service providers and the number of patients. GCs were recruited to participate via an online survey that assessed activities (categorized as typical genetic counseling, administrative, or professional development) performed by a clinical genetic counselor. Respondents indicated which activities represent their largest time consumers, their willingness to delegate these activities, and barriers to and perceived outcomes of delegation. Overall, respondents indicated that they spend 25% of their time performing administrative activities that they would largely be willing to delegate; however, respondents were generally unwilling to delegate many typical genetic counseling and professional development activities, citing concerns regarding accuracy and liability, and highlighting the belief that these activities constitute the core role of a genetic counselor. Respondents indicated that delegation of time‐consuming administrative activities would increase access to genetic services and improve job satisfaction. Additionally, differences were identified among clinical specialties regarding which activities were selected as top time consumers, indicating that potential targets of re‐allocation of time or delegation may be variable. This research indicates a need to reduce the number of administrative tasks in which GCs are directly involved to re‐allocate time toward core responsibilities, direct patient care, and professional development, the result of which is more efficient use of the GC skill‐set.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154327/1/jgc41181.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154327/2/jgc41181_am.pd