Mental health is a good example of a field where imperatives for partnership or collaborative working can be in tension with those for client confidentiality. Both imperatives have been reinforced by additional regulation in recent years, in response to major inquiries. Professionals face the dilemma that either sharing clients’ or patients’ information or not sharing it could lead to outcomes for which they might be blamed; any rule adopted risks one or other type of error. This article examines two cases from a larger interview-based study of how local organisations are trying practically to reconcile these competing pressures
Mental health professionals (MHP) working in court-mandated treatment settings face ethical dilemmas...
Research indicates that providing information about mental illness and involving families in the tre...
Families and friends play a vital role in the care and support of people with serious mental illness...
Mental health professionals are now debating client confidentiality and its relationship to care coo...
In recent years, there has been growing concern in the UK that local services aimed at risky or vuln...
This paper considers the nature and extent of the duty of patient confidentiality in the mental heal...
The present study aims to address a gap in current research focusing on relational outcomes of menta...
The negotiated order perspective developed from the study of informal practices in mental health hos...
Aims: Aims included to explore how, within a London trust, staff at the interface between patients, ...
The adult client\u27s conception of confidentiality in the therapeutic relationship and the valuing ...
Because of the development towards community care, care providers not only exchange information in a...
Amongst some of the most important and interesting ethical dilemmas facing street level bureaucrats ...
Client welfare is detrimentally affected by poor communication of data between rural service provide...
In 1994 the Department of Health published its guidance on the discharge of mentally disordered peop...
The negotiated order perspective developed from the study of informal practices in mental health hos...
Mental health professionals (MHP) working in court-mandated treatment settings face ethical dilemmas...
Research indicates that providing information about mental illness and involving families in the tre...
Families and friends play a vital role in the care and support of people with serious mental illness...
Mental health professionals are now debating client confidentiality and its relationship to care coo...
In recent years, there has been growing concern in the UK that local services aimed at risky or vuln...
This paper considers the nature and extent of the duty of patient confidentiality in the mental heal...
The present study aims to address a gap in current research focusing on relational outcomes of menta...
The negotiated order perspective developed from the study of informal practices in mental health hos...
Aims: Aims included to explore how, within a London trust, staff at the interface between patients, ...
The adult client\u27s conception of confidentiality in the therapeutic relationship and the valuing ...
Because of the development towards community care, care providers not only exchange information in a...
Amongst some of the most important and interesting ethical dilemmas facing street level bureaucrats ...
Client welfare is detrimentally affected by poor communication of data between rural service provide...
In 1994 the Department of Health published its guidance on the discharge of mentally disordered peop...
The negotiated order perspective developed from the study of informal practices in mental health hos...
Mental health professionals (MHP) working in court-mandated treatment settings face ethical dilemmas...
Research indicates that providing information about mental illness and involving families in the tre...
Families and friends play a vital role in the care and support of people with serious mental illness...